Comparison of dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of malignant skin tumours: a meta-analysis

被引:25
作者
Xiong, Yi-Quan [1 ]
Ma, Shu-Juan [2 ]
Mo, Yun [1 ]
Huo, Shu-Ting [1 ]
Wen, Yu-Qi [1 ]
Chen, Qing [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Trop Dis Res, 1838 Guangzhou North Rd, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Cent S Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Changsha 410008, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Skin cancer; Melanoma; Dermoscopy; Reflectance confocal microscopy; Meta-analysis; BASAL-CELL CARCINOMA; SCANNING LASER MICROSCOPY; MELANOMA DETECTION; EPILUMINESCENCE MICROSCOPY; MELANOCYTIC LESIONS; NAKED EYE; ACCURACY; CANCER; ENDOMICROSCOPY; APPLICABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00432-017-2391-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) are non-invasive methods for diagnosis of malignant skin tumours. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of dermoscopy and RCM for the diagnosis of malignant skin tumours. Methods Systematic electronic literature searches were conducted to include PubMed, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library database, and Web of Science, up to 26 April 2016. Pooled additional detection rate (ADR), diagnostic accuracy, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using STATA and Meta-Disc analysis. Results Eight published studies were included in the analysis, involving 1141 skin lesions, which reported a perlesion analysis of dermoscopy and RCM. Within the same patient group and at the per-lesion level, RCM significantly increased the detection rate of malignant skin tumours by 7.7% (95% CI 0.01-0.14). The pooled sensitivity of dermoscopy was similar to RCM [88.1% (95% CI 0.85-0.91) vs. 93.5% (95% CI 0.91-0.96)]. The specificity of dermoscopy was significantly lower than that of RCM [52.9% (95% CI 0.49-0.57) vs. 80.3% (95% CI 0.77-0.83)]. The pooled ADR of RCM for melanoma detection was 4.3% (95% CI 0.002-0.08). Pooled sensitivity and specificity of dermoscopy for melanoma detection were 88.4% (95% CI 0.84-0.92) and 49.1% (95% CI 0.45-0.53), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of RCM were 93.5% (95% CI 0.90-0.96) and 78.8% (95% CI 0.75-0.82), respectively. Conclusions When compared with dermoscopy, RCM has a significantly greater diagnostic specificity for malignant skin tumours and so could improve their detection rate.
引用
收藏
页码:1627 / 1635
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[31]   Systematic review of dermoscopy and digital dermoscopy/artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of melanoma [J].
Rajpara, S. M. ;
Botello, A. P. ;
Townend, J. ;
Ormerod, A. D. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2009, 161 (03) :591-604
[32]   Integration of reflectance confocal microscopy in sequential dermoscopy follow-up improves melanoma detection accuracy [J].
Stanganelli, I. ;
Longo, C. ;
Mazzoni, L. ;
Magi, S. ;
Medri, M. ;
Lanzanova, G. ;
Farnetani, F. ;
Pellacani, G. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 172 (02) :365-371
[33]  
Stevenson Alexander D, 2013, Dermatol Pract Concept, V3, P19, DOI 10.5826/dpc.0304a05
[34]   Epidemiology of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in Europe: accurate and comparable data are needed for effective public health monitoring and interventions [J].
Trakatelli, M. ;
Ulrich, C. ;
del Marmol, V. ;
Euvard, S. ;
Stockfleth, E. ;
Abeni, D. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 156 :1-7
[35]   Reflectance confocal microscopy allows in vivo real-time noninvasive assessment of the outcome of methyl aminolaevulinate photodynamic therapy of basal cell carcinoma [J].
Venturini, M. ;
Sala, R. ;
Gonzalez, S. ;
Calzavara-Pinton, P. G. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2013, 168 (01) :99-105
[36]   Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting [J].
Vestergaard, M. E. ;
Macaskill, P. ;
Holt, P. E. ;
Menzies, S. W. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2008, 159 (03) :669-676
[37]   Diagnostic performance of narrowed spectrum endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging, and confocal laser endomicroscopy for optical diagnosis of colonic polyps: a meta-analysis [J].
Wanders, Linda K. ;
East, James E. ;
Uitentuis, Sanne E. ;
Leeflang, Mariska M. G. ;
Dekker, Evelien .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (13) :1337-1347
[38]   QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies [J].
Whiting, Penny F. ;
Rutjes, Anne W. S. ;
Westwood, Marie E. ;
Mallett, Susan ;
Deeks, Jonathan J. ;
Reitsma, Johannes B. ;
Leeflang, Mariska M. G. ;
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. ;
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 155 (08) :529-U104
[39]   Non-invasive diagnosis of pink basal cell carcinoma: how much can we rely on dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy? [J].
Witkowski, A. M. ;
Ludzik, J. ;
DeCarvalho, N. ;
Ciardo, S. ;
Longo, C. ;
DiNardo, A. ;
Pellacani, G. .
SKIN RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 22 (02) :230-237
[40]   A meta-analysis of reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of malignant skin tumours [J].
Xiong, Y. D. ;
Ma, S. ;
Li, X. ;
Zhong, X. ;
Duan, C. ;
Chen, Q. .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2016, 30 (08) :1295-1302