Cervical Spine Motion During Tracheal Intubation Using an Optiscope Versus the McGrath Videolaryngoscope in Patients With Simulated Cervical Immobilization: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study

被引:14
|
作者
Nam, Karam [1 ]
Lee, Younsuk [2 ]
Park, Hee-Pyoung [1 ]
Chung, Jaeyeon [1 ]
Yoon, Hyun-Kyu [1 ]
Kim, Tae Kyong [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Dongguk Univ, Coll Med, Ilsan Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med,Med Ctr, Goyang, South Korea
关键词
IN-LINE STABILIZATION; GLOBAL LIGAMENTOUS INSTABILITY; 4 AIRWAY DEVICES; DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY; MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE; LIGHTWAND INTUBATION; SERIES; MANAGEMENT; FIBERSCOPE; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000003635
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: In patients with an unstable cervical spine, maintenance of cervical immobilization during tracheal intubation is important. In McGrath videolaryngoscopic intubation, lifting of the blade to raise the epiglottis is needed to visualize the glottis, but in patients with an unstable cervical spine, this can cause cervical spine movement. By contrast, the Optiscope, a rigid video-stylet, does not require raising of the epiglottis during tracheal intubation. We therefore hypothesized that the Optiscope would produce less cervical spine movement than the McGrath videolaryngoscope during tracheal intubation. The aim of this study was to compare the Optiscope with the McGrath videolaryngoscope with respect to cervical spine motion during intubation in patients with simulated cervical immobilization. METHODS: The primary outcome of the study was the extent of cervical spine motion at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, and C2-C5 segments. In this randomized crossover study, the cervical spine angle was measured before and during tracheal intubation using either the Optiscope or the McGrath videolaryngoscope in 21 patients with simulated cervical immobilization. Cervical spine motion was defined as the change in angle at each cervical segment during tracheal intubation. RESULTS: There was significantly less cervical spine motion at the occiput-C1 segment using the Optiscope rather than the McGrath videolaryngoscope (mean [98.33% CI]: 4.7 degrees [2.4-7.0] vs 10.4 degrees [8.1-12.7]; mean difference [98.33% CI]: -5.7 degrees [-7.5 to -3.9]). There were also fewer cervical spinal motions at the C1-C2 and C2-C5 segments using the Optiscope (mean difference versus the McGrath videolaryngoscope [98.33% CI]: -2.4 degrees [-3.7 to -1.2]) and -3.7 degrees [-5.9 to -1.4], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The Optiscope produces less cervical spine motion than the McGrath videolaryngoscope during tracheal intubation of patients with simulated cervical immobilization.
引用
收藏
页码:1666 / 1672
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [31] Comparative study of fiberoptic guided versus intubating laryngeal mask airway assisted awake orotracheal intubation in patients with unstable cervical spine
    Jadhav, Tanmay
    Sriganesh, Kamath
    Reddy, Madhusudan
    Chakrabarti, Dhritiman
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2017, 83 (08) : 804 - 811
  • [32] Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Suppan, L.
    Tramer, M. R.
    Niquille, M.
    Grosgurin, O.
    Marti, C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 116 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [33] Endotracheal Intubation by Paramedics Using Neodymium Magnet and Modified Stylet in Simulated Difficult Airway: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Manikin Study
    Bilge, Sedat
    Tezel, Onur
    Acar, Yahya Ayhan
    Aydin, Guclu
    Aydin, Attila
    Ozkan, Gokhan
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 2019
  • [34] Comparison of the paediatric blade of the Pentax-AWS and Ovassapian airway in fibreoptic tracheal intubation in patients with limited mouth opening and cervical spine immobilization by a semi-rigid neck collar: a randomized controlled trial
    Kim, D. H.
    Yoo, J. Y.
    Ha, S. Y.
    Chae, Y. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 119 (05) : 993 - 999
  • [35] Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope size 2 Macintosh blade with size 2 C-MAC D-Blade for laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in children with simulated cervical spine injury: A prospective randomized crossover study
    Sinha, Renu
    Ray, Bikash Ranjan
    Sharma, Ankur
    Pandey, Ravinder Kumar
    Punj, Jyotsna
    Darlong, Vanlalnghaka
    Trikha, Anjan
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 35 (04) : 509 - 514
  • [36] EFFECTS OF USING AN ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE INTRODUCER FOR INTUBATION DURING MECHANICAL CHEST COMPRESSIONS OF A MANIKIN: RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE, CROSSOVER STUDY
    Ozbek, Asim Enes
    Halhalli, Huseyin Cahit
    Yilmaz, Serkan
    Celik, Emrah
    Ozerol, Hakan
    Sanci, Emre
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 59 (01) : 56 - 60
  • [37] Direct versus indirect epiglottis elevation in cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization: a randomized controlled trial
    Choi, Seungeun
    Lee, Dong Ju
    Shin, Kyung Won
    Kim, Yoon Jung
    Park, Hee-Pyoung
    Oh, Hyongmin
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [38] Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway-assisted Flexible Bronchoscopic Intubation Is Associated With Reduced Cervical Spine Motion When Compared With C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy-guided Intubation: A Prospective Randomized Cross Over Trial
    Swain, Amlan
    Bhagat, Hemant
    Gupta, Vivek
    Salunke, Pravin
    Panda, Nidhi B.
    Sahu, Seelora
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 32 (03) : 242 - 248
  • [39] Comparison of C-MAC and McGrath-MAC Videolaryngoscopes for Intubation in Patients with Normal Airway by Donned Anaesthesiologists Using an Intubation Box During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective, Randomized Study
    Gupta, Nishkarsh
    Sarma, Riniki
    Vig, Saurabh
    Kumar, Vinod
    Gupta, Anju
    Mishra, Seema
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2022, 50 (04) : 255 - 260