Cervical Spine Motion During Tracheal Intubation Using an Optiscope Versus the McGrath Videolaryngoscope in Patients With Simulated Cervical Immobilization: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study

被引:14
|
作者
Nam, Karam [1 ]
Lee, Younsuk [2 ]
Park, Hee-Pyoung [1 ]
Chung, Jaeyeon [1 ]
Yoon, Hyun-Kyu [1 ]
Kim, Tae Kyong [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Dongguk Univ, Coll Med, Ilsan Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med,Med Ctr, Goyang, South Korea
关键词
IN-LINE STABILIZATION; GLOBAL LIGAMENTOUS INSTABILITY; 4 AIRWAY DEVICES; DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY; MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE; LIGHTWAND INTUBATION; SERIES; MANAGEMENT; FIBERSCOPE; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000003635
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: In patients with an unstable cervical spine, maintenance of cervical immobilization during tracheal intubation is important. In McGrath videolaryngoscopic intubation, lifting of the blade to raise the epiglottis is needed to visualize the glottis, but in patients with an unstable cervical spine, this can cause cervical spine movement. By contrast, the Optiscope, a rigid video-stylet, does not require raising of the epiglottis during tracheal intubation. We therefore hypothesized that the Optiscope would produce less cervical spine movement than the McGrath videolaryngoscope during tracheal intubation. The aim of this study was to compare the Optiscope with the McGrath videolaryngoscope with respect to cervical spine motion during intubation in patients with simulated cervical immobilization. METHODS: The primary outcome of the study was the extent of cervical spine motion at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, and C2-C5 segments. In this randomized crossover study, the cervical spine angle was measured before and during tracheal intubation using either the Optiscope or the McGrath videolaryngoscope in 21 patients with simulated cervical immobilization. Cervical spine motion was defined as the change in angle at each cervical segment during tracheal intubation. RESULTS: There was significantly less cervical spine motion at the occiput-C1 segment using the Optiscope rather than the McGrath videolaryngoscope (mean [98.33% CI]: 4.7 degrees [2.4-7.0] vs 10.4 degrees [8.1-12.7]; mean difference [98.33% CI]: -5.7 degrees [-7.5 to -3.9]). There were also fewer cervical spinal motions at the C1-C2 and C2-C5 segments using the Optiscope (mean difference versus the McGrath videolaryngoscope [98.33% CI]: -2.4 degrees [-3.7 to -1.2]) and -3.7 degrees [-5.9 to -1.4], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The Optiscope produces less cervical spine motion than the McGrath videolaryngoscope during tracheal intubation of patients with simulated cervical immobilization.
引用
收藏
页码:1666 / 1672
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Randomized crossover trial comparing cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope versus a C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope in a simulated immobilized cervical spine
    Paik, Hyesun
    Park, Hee-Pyoung
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [2] A Randomized Crossover Study Comparing Cervical Spine Motion During Intubation Between Two Lightwand Intubation Techniques in Patients With Simulated Cervical Immobilization: Laryngoscope-Assisted Versus Conventional Lightwand Intubation
    Kim, Tae Kyong
    Son, Je-Do
    Seo, Hyungseok
    Lee, Yun-Seok
    Bae, Jinyoung
    Park, Hee-Pyoung
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2017, 125 (02) : 485 - 490
  • [3] McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscope Versus Optiscope Video Stylet for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Manual Inline Cervical Stabilization: A Randomized Trial
    Yoon, Hyun-Kyu
    Lee, Hyung-Chul
    Park, Jung-Bin
    Oh, Hyongmin
    Park, Hee-Pyoung
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 130 (04) : 870 - 878
  • [4] Randomized crossover trial comparing cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope versus a C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope in a simulated immobilized cervical spine
    Hyesun Paik
    Hee-Pyoung Park
    BMC Anesthesiology, 20
  • [5] Cervical Spine Movement During Awake Orotracheal Intubation With Fiberoptic Scope and McGrath Videolaryngoscope in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Cervical Spine Instability: A Randomized Control Trial
    Dutta, Kaustuv
    Sriganesh, Kamath
    Chakrabarti, Dhritiman
    Pruthi, Nupur
    Reddy, Madhusudan
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 32 (03) : 249 - 255
  • [6] Effects of head-elevated position on tracheal intubation using a McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway: a prospective randomized crossover study
    Chun, Eun Hee
    Chung, Mi Hwa
    Kim, Jung Eun
    Kim, Kyung Mi
    Lee, Hye Sun
    Son, Jung Mo
    Park, Jiho
    Jun, Joo Hyun
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [7] Tracheal intubation with videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a randomized trial of the Airway Scope® and the GlideScope®
    Liu, E. H. C.
    Goy, R. W. L.
    Tan, B. H.
    Asai, T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 103 (03) : 446 - 451
  • [8] Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with King Vision™ video laryngoscopy and conventional laryngoscopy: a crossover randomized study
    El-Tahan, Mohamed R.
    El Kenany, Samah
    Khidr, Alaa M.
    Al Ghamdi, Abdulmohsen A.
    Tawfik, Ahmed M.
    Al Mulhim, Abdullah S.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2017, 83 (11) : 1152 - 1160
  • [9] Ease of Intubation with McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Incidence of Adverse Events During Tracheal Intubation in COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Observational Study
    Shamim, Faisal
    Sohaib, Muhammad
    Samad, Khalid
    Khan, Muhammad Faisal
    Manji, Adil A.
    Latif, Asad
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 9 (03) : 162 - 169
  • [10] The performance of C-MAC videostylet versus D-Blade during tracheal intubation in patients with simulated cervical immobilization: A randomized comparative trial
    Anany, Adel Said Mohammed
    Arida, Emad Eldin Abd El Monem
    Oll, Magda Mohamed Abo
    Rida, Hossam El-Din Fouad
    El-Attar, Eman Ahmed Mohamed
    Hozien, Adel Ibrahim
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 40 (01): : 308 - 316