What drives prioritized visual processing? A motivational relevance account

被引:19
作者
Maratos, Frances Anne [1 ,2 ]
Pessoa, Luiz [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Derby, Dept Psychol, Derby, England
[2] Univ Derby, Human Sci Res Ctr, Derby, England
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Psychol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Maryland Neuroimaging Ctr, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
来源
EMOTION AND COGNITION | 2019年 / 247卷
关键词
Visual attention; Threat superiority; Motivational relevance; Stimulus saliency; Prioritization; Load; Affect; Brain; Transient networks; GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER; AFFECT REDUCES BREADTH; MASKED ANGRY FACES; ATTENTIONAL BIAS; FEAR-RELEVANT; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; EMOTIONAL STIMULI; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; AMYGDALA RESPONSES; THREATENING FACES;
D O I
10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.028
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Emotion is fundamental to our being, and an essential aspect guiding behavior when rapid responding is required. This includes whether we approach or avoid a stimulus, and the accompanying physiological responses. A common tenet is that threat-related content drives stimulus processing and biases visual attention, so that rapid responding can be initiated. In this paper, it will be argued instead that prioritization of threatening stimuli should be encompassed within a motivational relevance framework. To more fully understand what is, or is not, prioritized for visual processing one must, however, additionally consider: (i) stimulus ambiguity and perceptual saliency; (ii) task demands, including both perceptual load and cognitive load; and (iii) endogenous/affective states of the individual. Combined with motivational relevance, this then leads to a multifactorial approach to understanding the drivers of prioritized visual processing. This accords with current recognition that the brain basis allowing for visual prioritization is also multifactorial, including transient, dynamic and overlapping networks. Taken together, the paper provides a reconceptualization of how "emotional" information prioritizes visual processing.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 148
页数:38
相关论文
共 220 条
[1]   Fear, faces, and the human amygdala [J].
Adolphs, Ralph .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (02) :166-172
[2]  
[Anonymous], CURRENT DIRECTIONS P
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ANXIETY ITS DISORDER
[4]   Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis [J].
Armstrong, Thomas ;
Olatunji, Bunmi O. .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 32 (08) :704-723
[5]   A review of attention biases in women with eating disorders [J].
Aspen, Vandana ;
Darcy, Alison M. ;
Lock, James .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 2013, 27 (05) :820-838
[6]   Prepared stimuli enhance aversive learning without weakening the impact of verbal instructions [J].
Atlas, Lauren Y. ;
Phelps, Elizabeth A. .
LEARNING & MEMORY, 2018, 25 (02) :100-104
[7]   Veterans with PTSD demonstrate amygdala hyperactivity while viewing threatening faces: A MEG study [J].
Badura-Brack, Amy ;
McDermott, Timothy J. ;
Heinrichs-Graham, Elizabeth ;
Ryan, Tara J. ;
Khanna, Maya M. ;
Pine, Daniel S. ;
Bar-Haim, Yair ;
Wilson, Tony W. .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 132 :228-232
[8]   The structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus [J].
Barrett, LF ;
Russell, AA .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 8 (01) :10-14
[9]   Attentional Selection Is Biased Toward Mood-Congruent Stimuli [J].
Becker, Mark W. ;
Leinenger, Mallorie .
EMOTION, 2011, 11 (05) :1248-1254
[10]   State anxiety modulation of the amygdala response to unattended threat-related stimuli [J].
Bishop, SJ ;
Duncan, J ;
Lawrence, AD .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 24 (46) :10364-10368