Why Do Employees Have Better Family Lives When They Are Highly Engaged at Work?

被引:114
作者
Ilies, Remus [1 ]
Liu, Xiao-Yu [2 ]
Liu, Yukun [1 ]
Zheng, Xiaoming [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Business Sch, Dept Management & Org, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Univ Int Business & Econ, Business Sch, Dept Human Resource Management & Org Behav, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Leadership & Org Management, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
work engagement; work-family interpersonal capitalization; family satisfaction; work-family balance; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; MULTILEVEL MODELS; MONTE-CARLO; RESOURCES; JOB; CONFLICT; BEHAVIOR; CONSEQUENCES; SPILLOVER;
D O I
10.1037/apl0000211
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Past research on the effects of work engagement on the family has demonstrated contrasting effects, with some suggesting that work engagement is beneficial for family life whereas others suggesting that it may be detrimental. In this research, using a sample of 125 employees who responded to daily surveys both at work and at home for 2 consecutive weeks, the authors present a multilevel examination of the relationships of work engagement to family outcomes aimed at elucidating such work-family effects. Their findings revealed that employees' daily work engagement experiences related positively, within individuals, to work-family interpersonal capitalization, which in turn, related positively to daily family satisfaction and to daily work-family balance. The findings also indicate that both the relationship between daily work engagement and work-family interpersonal capitalization and the indirect effects of daily work engagement on the family outcomes were stronger for employees with higher intrinsic motivation than for those with lower intrinsic motivation. The authors discuss theoretical and practical implications of the findings and offer directions for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:956 / 970
页数:15
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   THE WORK PREFERENCE INVENTORY - ASSESSING INTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC MOTIVATIONAL ORIENTATIONS [J].
AMABILE, TM ;
HILL, KG ;
HENNESSEY, BA ;
TIGHE, EM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 66 (05) :950-967
[2]   Daily Fluctuations in Work Engagement An Overview and Current Directions [J].
Bakker, Arnold B. .
EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2014, 19 (04) :227-236
[3]   Inequity in work and intimate relationships: a Spillover-Crossover model [J].
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Petrou, Paraskevas ;
Tsaousis, Ioannis .
ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING, 2012, 25 (05) :491-506
[4]  
Bakker AB, 2010, WORK ENGAGEMENT: A HANDBOOK OF ESSENTIAL THEORY AND RESEARCH, P181
[5]   Key questions regarding work engagement [J].
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Albrecht, Simon L. ;
Leiter, Michael P. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 20 (01) :4-28
[6]   Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers [J].
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Bal, P. Matthijs .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 83 (01) :189-206
[7]   Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations [J].
Bauer, Daniel J. ;
Preacher, Kristopher J. ;
Gil, Karen M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2006, 11 (02) :142-163
[8]   Do Other-Reports of Counterproductive Work Behavior Provide an Incremental Contribution Over Self-Reports? A Meta-Analytic Comparison [J].
Berry, Christopher M. ;
Carpenter, Nichelle C. ;
Barratt, Clare L. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 97 (03) :613-636
[9]   BACK-TRANSLATION FOR CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH [J].
BRISLIN, RW .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 1 (03) :185-216
[10]  
Butler A, 2013, CURR ISS WORK ORGAN, P133