Better late than never, but never late is better: Risk assessment of nuclear power construction projects

被引:29
作者
Portugal-Pereira, J. [1 ,2 ]
Ferreira, P. [3 ]
Cunha, J. [3 ]
Szklo, A. [1 ]
Schaeffer, R. [1 ]
Araujo, M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Ctr Tecnol, Energy Planning Program, Grad Sch Engn, Bloco C,Sala 211,Cidade Univ, BR-21941972 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Environm Policy, Weeks Bldg 16-18 Princes Gardens, London SW7 1BA, England
[3] Univ Minho, ALGORITMI Ctr, Sch Engn, Campus Azurem, P-4800058 Guimaraes, Portugal
关键词
Nuclear energy; Overnight construction costs; Financial costs; Risk assessment; RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEM; POST-FUKUSHIMA; COST OVERRUNS; ELECTRICITY INFRASTRUCTURE; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE; JAPAN; REACTORS; PLANTS; CHINA; MEGAPROJECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.041
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This work seeks to evaluate overnight construction costs (OCC) and lead-time escalation of nuclear power construction projects from 1955 to 2016. To this end, a comprehensive database of commercial Light Water Reactors (LWR) was developed and a statistical analysis was conducted. Findings reveal a significant delay in lead-time, especially for the last generation reactors constructed from 2010s, with 3/4 of the sample showing significant construction delays. This results in an escalation of capital costs rather than in a decline. Average OCC of newer reactors is 60% higher than the ones implemented in the earlier stages of the nuclear era. This suggests a discontinuity of the learning curve for both OCC and lead-time, which threats the market and financial sustainability of current and future nuclear energy projects. Although this is a general trend, this discontinuity is country specific and, thus, induced by national policies and regulatory frameworks. Therefore, the role of nuclear technology as an alternative to cope with the need for a decarbonisation of the power sector must be better evaluated, taking into account the real cost impacts of nuclear technology implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 166
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [11] Cooper M., 2014, EC FAILURE NUCL POWE
  • [12] De Bruijn Hans., 2008, Decision-Making on Mega-Projects, 84-101
  • [13] Does Brazil need new nuclear power plants?
    de Carvalho, Joaquim F.
    Sauer, Ildo L.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (04) : 1580 - 1584
  • [14] Values, Perceived Risks and Benefits, and Acceptability of Nuclear Energy
    de Groot, Judith I. M.
    Steg, Linda
    Poortinga, Wouter
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2013, 33 (02) : 307 - 317
  • [15] 100% renewable energy system in Japan: Smoothening and ancillary services
    Esteban, Miguel
    Portugal-Pereira, Joana
    Mclellan, Benjamin C.
    Bricker, Jeremy
    Farzaneh, Hooman
    Djalilova, Nigora
    Ishihara, Keiichi N.
    Takagi, Hiroshi
    Roeber, Volker
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 224 : 698 - 707
  • [16] Post-disaster resilience of a 100% renewable energy system in Japan
    Esteban, Miguel
    Portugal-Pereira, Joana
    [J]. ENERGY, 2014, 68 : 756 - 764
  • [17] Post-Fukushima Japan: The continuing nuclear controversy
    Fam, Shun Deng
    Xiong, Jieru
    Xiong, Gordon
    Yong, Ding Li
    Ng, Daniel
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 68 : 199 - 205
  • [18] Flyvbjerg B., 2013, UNDERESTIMATING COST, DOI [10.1080/01944360208976273, DOI 10.1080/01944360208976273]
  • [19] Flyvbjerg B., 2015, PRINCIPLE MALEVOLENT
  • [20] Cost overruns and financial risk in the construction of nuclear power reactors: A critical appraisal
    Gilbert, Alexander
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    Johnstone, Phil
    Stirling, Andy
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 102 : 644 - 649