Better late than never, but never late is better: Risk assessment of nuclear power construction projects

被引:29
作者
Portugal-Pereira, J. [1 ,2 ]
Ferreira, P. [3 ]
Cunha, J. [3 ]
Szklo, A. [1 ]
Schaeffer, R. [1 ]
Araujo, M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Ctr Tecnol, Energy Planning Program, Grad Sch Engn, Bloco C,Sala 211,Cidade Univ, BR-21941972 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Environm Policy, Weeks Bldg 16-18 Princes Gardens, London SW7 1BA, England
[3] Univ Minho, ALGORITMI Ctr, Sch Engn, Campus Azurem, P-4800058 Guimaraes, Portugal
关键词
Nuclear energy; Overnight construction costs; Financial costs; Risk assessment; RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEM; POST-FUKUSHIMA; COST OVERRUNS; ELECTRICITY INFRASTRUCTURE; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE; JAPAN; REACTORS; PLANTS; CHINA; MEGAPROJECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.041
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This work seeks to evaluate overnight construction costs (OCC) and lead-time escalation of nuclear power construction projects from 1955 to 2016. To this end, a comprehensive database of commercial Light Water Reactors (LWR) was developed and a statistical analysis was conducted. Findings reveal a significant delay in lead-time, especially for the last generation reactors constructed from 2010s, with 3/4 of the sample showing significant construction delays. This results in an escalation of capital costs rather than in a decline. Average OCC of newer reactors is 60% higher than the ones implemented in the earlier stages of the nuclear era. This suggests a discontinuity of the learning curve for both OCC and lead-time, which threats the market and financial sustainability of current and future nuclear energy projects. Although this is a general trend, this discontinuity is country specific and, thus, induced by national policies and regulatory frameworks. Therefore, the role of nuclear technology as an alternative to cope with the need for a decarbonisation of the power sector must be better evaluated, taking into account the real cost impacts of nuclear technology implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 166
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], NUCL POW SPAIN
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, WORLD FACTBOOK
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2003, The Future of Nuclear Power, an Interdisciplinary Study
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, Nuclear power in Japan
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1973, 2 INT S INF THEOR BU, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5_38, 10.1007/978-0-387-98135-2, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-538, 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0]
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2017, POW REACT INF SYST P
  • [7] A comparative institutional analysis of the Fukushima nuclear disaster: Lessons and policy implications
    Aoki, Masahiko
    Rothwell, Geoffrey
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 53 : 240 - 247
  • [8] THE ECONOMIC-IMPLICATIONS OF LEARNING BY DOING
    ARROW, KJ
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1962, 29 (80) : 155 - 173
  • [9] Nuclear reactors' construction costs: The role of lead-time, standardization and technological progress
    Berthelemy, Michel
    Rangel, Lina Escobar
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 82 : 118 - 130
  • [10] Cost overruns and delays in energy megaprojects: How big is big enough?
    Callegari, C.
    Szklo, A.
    Schaeffer, R.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 114 : 211 - 220