Tube-based robust model predictive control for spacecraft proximity operations in the presence of persistent disturbance

被引:54
作者
Mammarella, M. [1 ]
Capello, E. [2 ]
Park, H. [3 ]
Guglieri, G. [1 ]
Romano, M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Corso Duca Abruzzi 24, I-10129 Turin, Italy
[2] Politecn Torino, CNR, IEIIT, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Corso Duca Abruzzi 24, I-10129 Turin, Italy
[3] New Mexico State Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
[4] US Navy, Postgrad Sch, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, 1 Univ Circle, Monterey, CA 93943 USA
关键词
Robust control; Model predictive control; Automated rendezvous and docking; DOCKING MANEUVERS; GUIDANCE; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ast.2018.04.009
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Rendezvous and Proximity Operations (RPOs) of two autonomous spacecraft have been extensively studied in the past years, taking into account both the strict requirements in terms of spacecraft dynamics variations and the limitations due to the actuation system. In this paper, two different Model Predictive Control (MPC) schemes have been considered to control the spacecraft during the final phase of the rendezvous maneuver in order to ensure mission constraints satisfaction for any modeled disturbance affecting the system. Classical MPC suitably balances stability and computational effort required for online implementation whereas Tube-based Robust MPC represents an appealing strategy to handle disturbances while ensuring robustness. For the robust scheme, the computational effort reduction is ensured adopting a time-varying control law where the feedback gain matrix is evaluated offline, applying a Linear Matrix Inequality approach to the state feedback stabilization criterion. An extensive verification campaign for the performance evaluation and comparison in terms of constraint satisfaction, fuel consumption and computational cost, i.e. CPU time, has been carried out on both a three degrees-of-freedom (DoF) orbital simulator and an experimental testbed composed by two Floating Spacecraft Simulators reproducing a quasi-frictionless motion. Main conclusions are drawn with respect to the mission expectations. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 594
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[21]  
Rawlings Rawlings J. J., MODEL PREDICTIVE CON
[22]   Planar air-bearing microgravity simulators: Review of applications, existing solutions and design parameters [J].
Rybus, Tomasz ;
Seweryn, Karol .
ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2016, 120 :239-259
[23]  
Saponara M., 2011, P 4 EUR C AER SCI PE
[24]   Nonlinear control of motion synchronization for satellite proximity operations [J].
Subbarao, Kamesh ;
Welsh, Sam .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2008, 31 (05) :1284-1294
[25]  
Tempo R., 2012, Randomized algorithms for analysis and control of uncertain systems: with applications
[26]   Experimental evaluation of model predictive control and inverse dynamics control for spacecraft proximity and docking maneuvers [J].
Virgili-Llop J. ;
Zagaris C. ;
Park H. ;
Zappulla R., II ;
Romano M. .
CEAS Space Journal, 2018, 10 (1) :37-49
[27]   Spacecraft Thruster Control via Sigma-Delta Modulation [J].
Zappulla, Richard ;
Virgili-Llop, Josep ;
Romano, Marcello .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2017, 40 (11) :2928-2933
[28]   Dynamic Air-Bearing Hardware-in-the-Loop Testbed to Experimentally Evaluate Autonomous Spacecraft Proximity Maneuvers [J].
Zappulla, Richard, II ;
Virgili-Llop, Josep ;
Zagaris, Costantinos ;
Park, Hyeongjun ;
Romano, Marcello .
JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2017, 54 (04) :825-839