A comparative DFT study of Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions adsorption on (100) and (110) surfaces of pyrite: An electrochemical point of view

被引:17
作者
Nourmohamadi, Hossein [1 ]
Aghazadeh, Valeh [1 ]
Esrafili, Mehdi D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sahand Univ Technol, Min Engn Fac, Mineral Proc Dept, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Univ Maragheh, Dept Chem, Lab Theoret Chem, Maragheh, Iran
关键词
adsorption; density functional theory; ferric ion; pyrite surfaces; reduction; DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL THEORY; ELECTRONIC-STRUCTURE; OXIDATION; KINETICS; FES2(100); COPPER; STATES;
D O I
10.1002/sia.6728
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Pyrite acts as a catalyst in the mineral processing, and the speed of ferric ion reduction and mineral decomposition increases with increasing cathodic points. In this study, the ferric ion interaction on the (100) and (110) surfaces of pyrite was studied using the density functional theory calculations. The analysis of stability, density of states, and electron density were performed to understand the interaction between the ferric ion and pyrite surfaces. The results showed that pyrite surface is chemically active and tends to absorb ferric ion between two surface sulfur atoms. The hyperconjugation between the 3d orbital of ferric ion and the 3p or 3d orbitals of surface atoms provides the conditions for the Fe3+ ion adsorption. The molecular orbital (MO) and electron density analyses indicate that the 3p orbitals of S atoms play a more important role in bonds formations relative to the 3d orbitals. The (110) surface is more active, and the adsorption energy is larger than that of surface (100), which is the result of decreased cation coordination and the presence of sulfur at the surface. Subsequently, the interaction of the Fe2+ ion, as product of Fe3+ ion reduction and its competitor for adsorption, on the surfaces was studied. The Fe2 + ion adsorbs stronger at the surface of (110), and the adsorption energies at (100) and (110) surfaces were obtained as -24 and -47 kcal/mol, respectively. In general, the Fe3+ ion is a stronger oxidizing agent than Fe2+ on pyrite surfaces.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 118
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Variations in the compositional, textural and electrical properties of natural pyrite: a review [J].
Abraitis, PK ;
Pattrick, RAD ;
Vaughan, DJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINERAL PROCESSING, 2004, 74 (1-4) :41-59
[2]   ANODIC ELECTROCHEMISTRY OF CHALCOPYRITE [J].
BIEGLER, T ;
SWIFT, DA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ELECTROCHEMISTRY, 1979, 9 (05) :545-554
[3]   Solid-liquid mass transfer limitation of ferrous iron in the chemical oxidation of FeS2 at high redox potential [J].
Boon, M ;
Heijnen, JJ .
HYDROMETALLURGY, 2001, 62 (01) :57-66
[4]  
Bragg WL, 1914, ANAL CRYSTALS XRAY S, V89
[5]   Electronic structure of bulk and (001) surface layers of pyrite FeS2 [J].
Cai, J ;
Philpott, MR .
COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2004, 30 (3-4) :358-363
[6]   The mechanisms of pyrite oxidation and leaching: A fundamental perspective [J].
Chandra, A. P. ;
Gerson, A. R. .
SURFACE SCIENCE REPORTS, 2010, 65 (09) :293-315
[7]  
Corinne A, 2019, MAT RES, V22, P1
[8]  
Dana J.D., 1977, Manual of Mineralogy, V19th
[9]   Pyrite oxidation in acidic medium: overall reaction pathway [J].
Demoisson, Frederic ;
Mullet, Martine ;
Humbert, Bernard .
SURFACE AND INTERFACE ANALYSIS, 2008, 40 (3-4) :343-348
[10]  
Dixon DG, 2008, CAN METALL QUART, V47, P327, DOI 10.1179/000844308794408317