A comparison between the European and the Brazilian models for management and diagnosis of river basins

被引:3
作者
Bettencourt, Pedro [1 ,2 ]
Fulgencio, Claudia [1 ]
Grade, Maria [1 ]
Wasserman, Julio Cesar [2 ]
机构
[1] Lda Estr Paco Lumiar, Nemus Gestao & Requalificacao Ambiental, Campus Lumiar,Edificio D, P-1649038 Lisbone, Portugal
[2] Univ Fed Fluminense, Inst Geosci, Programme Sustainable Management Syst, Av Litoranea,S-N Boa Viagem, BR-24210340 Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Brazil; European Union; River basin; Water Framework Directive; Water management; Water quality; GREAT EXPECTATIONS; WATER MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; PARTICIPATION; DECENTRALIZATION; GOVERNANCE; RESOURCES; POLICY;
D O I
10.2166/wp.2021.204
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Water management is assuming more and more importance as freshwater resources are becoming scarce, both in quality and in quantity, across many developed and developing countries. This trend can be attributed to population growth, industrialization, growing agricultural demand, poor water management practices and climate change. In attempting to deal with the intensification of water quality- and quantity-related problems in recent decades, many countries have revised their water resource management policies and legislation, introducing new institutional frameworks and management instruments. Considering regional geographic and cultural distinctions, the present article aims at comparing the models of water resource management in the European Union (EU) and in Brazil. Institutional and legal arrangements currently in place, water planning and management instruments currently in use, assessments of water body status and watershed diagnoses were analysed. Main strengths and weaknesses of each water management system are pointed out in the conclusion. Main challenges for the water sector, and highlights of the converging and diverging points concerning water resource management systems, in each region, are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 76
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Organizing for governance: Building collaboration in Brazilian river basins [J].
Abers, Rebecca Neaera .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 35 (08) :1450-1463
[2]   Mobilizing the State: The Erratic Partner in Brazil's Participatory Water Policy [J].
Abers, Rebecca Neaera ;
Keck, Margaret E. .
POLITICS & SOCIETY, 2009, 37 (02) :289-314
[3]   The Link between Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing in the Implementation of the European Water Framework Directive: Assessing Four River Basins in Europe [J].
Akinsete, Ebun ;
Apostolaki, Stella ;
Chatzistamoulou, Nikos ;
Koundouri, Phoebe ;
Tsani, Stella .
WATER, 2019, 11 (03)
[4]  
Albiac J, 2020, WATER ALTERN, V13, P674
[5]  
ANA-Brazilian Agency of Waters, 2018, REL CONJ REC HIDR BR
[6]  
ANA-Brazilian Agency of Waters, 2017, REL CONJ REC HIDR BR
[7]  
ANA-Brazilian Agency of Waters, 2019, ATL ESG DESP BAC HID
[8]  
ANA-Brazilian Agency of Waters, 2019, OBJ DES SUST NUM 6 B
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy, P1
[10]   Water resource management: A comparative evaluation of Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, the European Union, and Portugal [J].
Araujo, Ronaldo S. ;
Alves, Maria da Gloria ;
Teresa Condesso de Melo, M. ;
Chrispim, Zelia M. P. ;
Paula Mendes, M. ;
Silva Junior, Gerson C. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 511 :815-828