Fracture Risk After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs Adjustable Gastric Banding Among Medicare Beneficiaries

被引:38
|
作者
Yu, Elaine W. [1 ]
Kim, Seoyoung C. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sturgeon, Daniel J. [3 ,5 ]
Lindeman, Katherine G. [1 ]
Weissman, Joel S. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Div Rheumatol Immunol & Allergy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
BARIATRIC SURGERY; BONE METABOLISM; SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY; ASSOCIATION; MORTALITY; OBESITY; IDENTIFICATION; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1157
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCERoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is associated with significant bone loss and may increase fracture risk, whereas substantial bone loss and increased fracture risk have not been reported after adjustable gastric banding (AGB). Previous studies have had little representation of patients aged 65 years or older, and it is currently unknown how age modifies fracture risk. ObjectiveTo compare fracture risk after RYGB and AGB procedures in a large, nationally representative cohort enriched for older adults. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis population-based retrospective cohort analysis used Medicare claims data from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2014, from 42345 severely obese adults, of whom 29624 received RYGB and 12 721 received AGB. Data analysis was performed from April 2017 to November 2018. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was incident nonvertebral (ie, wrist, humerus, pelvis, and hip) fractures after RYGB and AGB surgery defined using a combination of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition and Current Procedural Terminology 4 codes. ResultsOf 42345 participants, 33254 (78.5%) were women. With a mean (SD) age of 51 (12) years, recipients of RYGB were younger than AGB recipients (55 [12] years). Both groups had similar comorbidities, medication use, and health care utilization in the 365 days before surgery. Over a mean (SD) follow-up of 3.5 (2.1) years, 658 nonvertebral fractures were documented. The fracture incidence rate was 6.6 (95% CI, 6.0-7.2) after RYGB and 4.6 (95% CI, 3.9-5.3) after AGB, which translated to a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.73 (95% CI, 1.45-2.08) after multivariable adjustment. Site-specific analyses demonstrated an increased fracture risk at the hip (HR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.82-4.49), wrist (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.33-2.14), and pelvis (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.08-2.07) among RYGB recipients. No significant interactions of fracture risk with age, sex, diabetes status, or race were found. In particular, adults 65 years and older showed similar patterns of fracture risk to younger adults. Sensitivity analyses using propensity score matching showed similar results (nonvertebral fracture: HR 1.75; 95% CI, 1.22-2.52). Conclusions and RelevanceThis study of a large, US population-based cohort including a substantial population of older adults found a 73% increased risk of nonvertebral fracture after RYGB compared with AGB, including increased risk of hip, wrist, and pelvis fractures. Fracture risk was consistently increased among RYGB patients vs AGB across different subgroups, and to a similar degree among older and younger adults. Increased fracture risk appears to be an important unintended consequence of RYGB.
引用
收藏
页码:746 / 753
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding
    Nguyen, Nam Q.
    Game, Philip
    Bessell, Justin
    Debreceni, Tamara L.
    Neo, Melissa
    Burgstad, Carly M.
    Taylor, Pennie
    Wittert, Gary A.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (36) : 6035 - 6043
  • [2] Fracture Risk After Bariatric Surgery: Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Adjustable Gastric Banding
    Yu, Elaine W.
    Lee, Moa P.
    Landon, Joan E.
    Lindeman, Katherine G.
    Kim, Seoyoung C.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2017, 32 (06) : 1229 - 1236
  • [3] Outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding
    Nam Q Nguyen
    Philip Game
    Justin Bessell
    Tamara L Debreceni
    Melissa Neo
    Carly M Burgstad
    Pennie Taylor
    Gary A Wittert
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, (36) : 6035 - 6043
  • [4] Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding after previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
    Carpenter, Robert Owens
    Williams, David Brandon
    Richards, William Owen
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2010, 6 (01) : 93 - 95
  • [5] Comparing Medical Costs and Use After Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
    Lewis, Kristina H.
    Zhang, Fang
    Arterburn, David E.
    Ross-Degnan, Dennis
    Gillman, Matthew W.
    Wharam, J. Frank
    JAMA SURGERY, 2015, 150 (08) : 787 - 794
  • [6] Conversion of Adjustable Gastric Banding to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Not as Optimal as Primary Gastric Bypass?
    Gagner, Michel
    JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (08) : 786 - 787
  • [7] Revision of Failed Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
    B van Wageningen
    F J Berends
    B Van Ramshorst
    I F M Janssen
    Obesity Surgery, 2006, 16 : 137 - 141
  • [8] Revision of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
    van Wageningen, B
    Berends, FJ
    van Ramshorst, B
    Janssen, IFM
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2006, 16 (02) : 137 - 141
  • [9] Tips and Tricks of Converting Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in one Stage
    Nimeri, Abdelrahman A.
    Maasher, Ahmed
    Al Shaban, Talat
    Salim, Elnazeer
    Ibrahim, Maha
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2016, 26 (12) : 3066 - 3068
  • [10] Conversion of Adjustable Gastric Banding to Adjustable Banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Should We Leave the Band in Place?
    Lecot, Frederik P. D. M.
    Boerma, Evert-Jan G.
    Sigterman-Nelissen, Rochelle
    Meesters, Berry
    Fransen, Sofie
    Greve, Jan Willem
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2019, 29 (12) : 3912 - 3918