共 29 条
Comparison of Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant in Younger Versus Older Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression: Post-Hoc Analysis of SUSTAIN-2, a Long-Term Open-Label Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy Study
被引:22
作者:
Ochs-Ross, Rachel
[1
]
Wajs, Ewa
[2
]
Daly, EllaJ.
[3
]
Zhang, Yun
[4
]
Lane, Rosanne
[1
]
Lim, Pilar
[1
]
Drevets, Wayne C.
[5
]
Steffens, David C.
[6
]
Sanacora, Gerard
[7
]
Jamieson, Carol
[4
]
Hough, David
[1
]
Manji, Husseini
[1
]
Singh, Jaskaran B.
[5
]
机构:
[1] Janssen Res & Dev, Titusville, NJ USA
[2] Janssen Res & Dev, Beerse, Belgium
[3] Janssen Neurosci Med Affairs, Titusville, NJ USA
[4] Janssen Res & Dev, Fermont, CA USA
[5] Janssen Res & Dev, San Diego, CA USA
[6] Univ Connecticut, Sch Med, Farmington, CT USA
[7] Yale Univ, Yale Depress Res Program, New Haven, CT USA
关键词:
Older adults;
esketamine;
long-term;
safety;
treatment-resistant depression;
GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER;
ELECTROCONVULSIVE-THERAPY;
PRIMARY-CARE;
FALLS;
ECT;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jagp.2021.09.014
中图分类号:
R592 [老年病学];
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号:
03 ;
0303 ;
100203 ;
摘要:
Background: Older, compared with younger, patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) typically have lower response and remission rates with poorer tolerability to antidepressant treatment. This post-hoc analysis com-pared outcomes following treatment with esketamine nasal spray (ESK) between younger (18-64 years) and older (>= 65 years) patients with TRD. Metbods: SUSTAIN-2, an up to 1-year open-label safety and efficacy study of ESK plus an oral antidepressant, included patients with TRD either directly enrolled (>= 18-year) or transferred from a phase 3 double-blind study, TRANS -FORM-3 (>= 65-year). Patients were treated in two phases: 4-week induction and 48-week optimization/maintenance. Results: Younger (n = 624) and older (n = 178) patients had similar baseline characteristics except for hypertension history (21.5% versus 48.3%, respectively). Patients (younger versus older) had & DBLBOND; similar mean baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores and mean (SD) reductions in MADRS total scores for induction (-18.0 [7.19] versus -18.1 [9.37]; p = 0.492 [t = 0.69, df = 701]) and optimization/maintenance (week 12) (-19.9 [7.03] versus -22.2 [9.50]; p = 0.265 [t = -1.12, df = 3470]) phases. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported in younger versus older patients, respectively, were: induction, 86.1% versus 74.8%; optimization/maintenance, 86.8% versus 81.0%; serious TEAEs: induction, 2.2% versus 1.9%; optimization/maintenance, 6.7% versus 4.8%; TEAEs of increased blood pressure: induction, 6.9% versus 6.5%; optimization/ maintenance, 7.1% versus 9.5%; and falls: induction, 0.3% versus 0.6%; optimization/maintenance, 0.2% versus 0.8%. Cognitive tests did not show clinically meaningful differences between the age groups. Conclusions: Although limited by the open-label design of SUSTAIN-2, this post-hoc analysis showed generally comparable improvement in depression between ESK-treated younger and older adult patients with TRD, with consistent safety outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 556
页数:16
相关论文