Identification of a DNA Methylation-Based Prognostic Signature for Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

被引:7
作者
Gao, Yinqi [1 ]
Wang, Xuelong [2 ]
Li, Shihui [1 ]
Zhang, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Li, Xuefei [1 ]
Lin, Fangcai [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Dept Breast Surg, Elect Power Teaching Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Dept Thorac Surg, Elect Power Teaching Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2021年 / 27卷
关键词
DNA Methylation; Prognosis; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms; PROMOTER METHYLATION; POOR-PROGNOSIS; EXPRESSION; ANGIOGENESIS; GENE; RESISTANCE; BIOMARKER; SURVIVAL; FEATURES; INSIGHT;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.930025
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Aberrant DNA methylation is an important biological regulatory mechanism in malignant tumors. However, it remains underutilized for establishing prognostic models for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Material/Methods: Methylation data and expression data downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were used to identify differentially methylated sites (DMSs). The prognosis-related DMSs were selected by univariate Cox regression analysis. Functional enrichment was analyzed using DAVID. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed using STRING. Finally, a methylation-based prognostic signature was constructed using LASSO method and further validated in 2 validation cohorts. Results: Firstly, we identified 743 DMSs corresponding to 332 genes, including 357 hypermethylated sites and 386 hypomethylated sites. Furthermore, we selected 103 prognosis-related DMSs by univariate Cox regression. Using a LASSO algorithm, we established a 5-DMSs prognostic signature in TCGA-TNBC cohort, which could classify TNBC patients with significant survival difference (log-rank p=4.97E-03). Patients in the high-risk group had shorter overall survival than patients in the low-risk group. The excellent performance was validated in GSE78754 (HR=2.42, 95%CI: 1.27-4.59, log-rank P=0.0055). Moreover, for disease-free survival, the prognostic performance was verified in GSE141441 (HR=2.09, 95%CI: 1.28-3.44, log-rank P=0.0027). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the 5-DMSs signature could serve as an independent risk factor. Conclusions: We constructed a 5-DMSs signature with excellent performance for the prediction of disease-free survival and overall survival, providing a guide for clinicians in directing personalized therapeutic regimen selection of TNBC patients.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Identification of dysregulated microRNAs in triple-negative breast cancer
    Yang, Fang
    Zhang, Wenwen
    Shen, Yan
    Guan, Xiaoxiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 46 (03) : 927 - 932
  • [42] Identification of a prognosis-associated signature associated with energy metabolism in triple-negative breast cancer
    Li, Chao
    Li, Xujun
    Li, Guangming
    Sun, Long
    Zhang, Wei
    Jiang, Jing
    Ge, Qidong
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2020, 44 (03) : 819 - 837
  • [43] Vimentin as a poor prognostic factor for triple-negative breast cancer
    Yamashita, Nami
    Tokunaga, Eriko
    Kitao, Hiroyuki
    Hisamatsu, Yuichi
    Taketani, Kenji
    Akiyoshi, Sayuri
    Okada, Satoko
    Aishima, Shinichi
    Morita, Masaru
    Maehara, Yoshihiko
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 139 (05) : 739 - 746
  • [44] Prognostic Alternative mRNA Splicing Signature and a Novel Biomarker in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Liu, Qiang
    Wang, Xiangyu
    Kong, Xiangyi
    Yang, Xue
    Cheng, Ran
    Zhang, Wenxiang
    Gao, Peng
    Chen, Li
    Wang, Zhongzhao
    Fang, Yi
    Wang, Jing
    DNA AND CELL BIOLOGY, 2020, 39 (06) : 1051 - 1063
  • [45] TMPRSS4 as a Poor Prognostic Factor for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Cheng, Daye
    Kong, Hong
    Li, Yunhui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2013, 14 (07) : 14659 - 14668
  • [46] Triple-negative breast cancer
    Chacon, Reinaldo D.
    Costanzo, Maria V.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 12
  • [47] KLF4 and NANOG are prognostic biomarkers for triple-negative breast cancer
    Nagata, Takuya
    Shimada, Yutaka
    Sekine, Shinichi
    Moriyama, Makoto
    Hashimoto, Isaya
    Matsui, Koshi
    Okumura, Tomoyuki
    Hori, Takashi
    Imura, Johji
    Tsukada, Kazuhiro
    BREAST CANCER, 2017, 24 (02) : 326 - 335
  • [48] A novel prognostic two-gene signature for triple negative breast cancer
    Alsaleem, Mansour A.
    Ball, Graham
    Toss, Michael S.
    Raafat, Sara
    Aleskandarany, Mohammed
    Joseph, Chitra
    Ogden, Angela
    Bhattarai, Shristi
    Rida, Padmashree C. G.
    Khani, Francesca
    Davis, Melissa
    Elemento, Olivier
    Aneja, Ritu
    Ellis, Ian O.
    Green, Andrew
    Mongan, Nigel P.
    Rakha, Emad
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2020, 33 (11) : 2208 - 2220
  • [49] Prognostic factors in triple-negative breast cancer: a retrospective cohort
    Assuncao Ribeiro da Costa, Rafael Everton
    Rocha de Oliveira, Fergus Tomas
    Nascimento Araujo, Ana Lucia
    Vieira, Sabas Carlos
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2021, 67 (07): : 950 - 957
  • [50] Tumor microenvironment characterization in triple-negative breast cancer identifies prognostic gene signature
    Qin, Yan
    Deng, Jiehua
    Zhang, Lihua
    Yuan, Jiaxing
    Yang, Huawei
    Li, Qiuyun
    AGING-US, 2021, 13 (04): : 5485 - 5505