Sustainable Energy Autarky and the Evolution of German Bioenergy Villages

被引:4
作者
Pienkowski, Dariusz [1 ]
Zbaraszewski, Wojciech [2 ]
机构
[1] Poznan Univ Life Sci, Fac Econ & Social Sci, Dept Social Sci & Pedag, Ul Wojska Polskiego 28, PL-60637 Poznan, Poland
[2] West Pomeranian Univ Technol Szczecin, Fac Econ, Dept Syst Anal & Mkt, Ul Janickiego 31, PL-71270 Szczecin, Poland
关键词
energy autarky model; energy policy; renewables; economic equilibrium of autarkical systems; absolute and relative autarky; RENEWABLE ENERGY; DRIVERS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.3390/su11184996
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The concept of an autarky has a long history and meaning related to its negation and unpopularity. In liberal schools of economics, autarky is usually considered from the perspectives of economic trade protectionism, closed economies, and threats to welfare. Nevertheless, the concept of autarky has gained a new meaning, understood as the local utilization of renewable energy resources from the perspective of their inter- and intragenerational distribution. Local action is shaped by the global perspective. This research consists of three steps. First, a model of energy autarky has been offered based on the system theory. The model shows the variety of the structures and features of energy systems offered in today's debates on energy autarky. Second, the key postulates of sustainable development have been presented to define an autarkical sustainable energy system. Finally, the concept of bioenergy villages in Germany has been presented to illustrate the approach to energy autarky. The research shows that the concept of autarky and single solutions, such as the use of renewable resources, are not themselves a success from the perspective of sustainable development; this misunderstanding is well illustrated by the evolution of the German concept of bioenergy villages into smart villages.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 62 条
[11]   Carbon mitigation by the energy crop, Miscanthus [J].
Clifton-Brown, John C. ;
Breuer, Joeern ;
Jones, Michael B. .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2007, 13 (11) :2296-2307
[12]   Energy storage - a key technology for global energy sustainability [J].
Dell, RM ;
Rand, DAJ .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2001, 100 (1-2) :2-17
[13]  
Deutschle J, 2015, Z ENERGIEWIRTSCHAFT, V39, P151, DOI DOI 10.1007/S12398-015-0160-5
[14]   Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review [J].
Dincer, I .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2000, 4 (02) :157-175
[15]  
Dronninglund Fjernvarme, 2015, SUNST 3 PHAS 2 IMPL, P44
[16]  
Ekelund R.B., 1975, HIST EC THEORY METHO, P508
[17]   Comparing drivers, barriers, and opportunities of business models for renewable energies: A review [J].
Engelken, Maximilian ;
Roemer, Benedikt ;
Drescher, Marcus ;
Welpe, Isabell M. ;
Picot, Arnold .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 60 :795-809
[18]  
European Commission, 2015, BEST PRACT REN EN SE, P14
[19]  
Forderverein des Neue-Energien-Forum Feldheim e.V, OV EN SELF SUFF VILL
[20]   Analysis of drivers affecting the use of market premium for renewables in Germany [J].
Genoese, Massimo ;
Slednev, Viktor ;
Fichtner, Wolf .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 97 :494-506