Ruminative and dampening responses to positive affect in bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder

被引:12
作者
Hanssen, I. [1 ,2 ]
Regeer, E. J. [1 ]
Schut, D. [1 ,2 ]
Boelen, P. A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Altrecht Inst Mental Hlth Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Clin Psychol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Arq Psychotrauma Expert Grp, Diemen, Netherlands
关键词
Bipolar Disorder; Major Depressive Disorder; Dampening; Rumination; Positive Affect; APPROACH SYSTEM BAS; MENTAL-HEALTH SURVEY; COGNITIVE THERAPY; MOOD DISORDERS; PREDOMINANT POLARITY; EMOTION; PREVALENCE; DYSREGULATION; SYMPTOMS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.06.009
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Although previous research has focused on distinguishing cognitive styles between Bipolar Disorder (BD) and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), little is known about differences in positive affect regulation between these affective groups. The aim of the present study was to extend previous research by investigating such differences between BD and MDD, and between the bipolar subtypes (BD-I vs. BD-II and predominant polarities), using large, clinical, outpatient samples. Methods: In total, 298 participants (96 BD-I, 27 BD-II, and 175 MDD) were included. All completed the Responses to Positive Affect (RPA) questionnaire. Mood symptoms in BD patients were clinically assessed by means of the Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Disorders (CGI-BP), while depressive symptom severity in MDD patients were assessed by means of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-SR). Results: Results showed differences between affective groups and bipolar subtypes. The most salient finding was that both BD-I and BD-II patients were more likely to ruminate about positive affect than MDD patients, while MDD patients were more likely to engage in dampening responses to positive affect. Conclusions: Differentiation of responses to positive affect between BD and MDD may have relevant clinical implications in terms of symptomatology, course, and treatment. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 77
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review [J].
Aldao, Amelia ;
Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan ;
Schweizer, Susanne .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 30 (02) :217-237
[2]   Behavioral approach system (BAS) sensitivity and bipolar spectrum disorders: A retrospective and concurrent behavioral high-risk design [J].
Alloy, Lauren B. ;
Abramson, Lyn Y. ;
Walshaw, Patricia D. ;
Cogswell, Alex ;
Smith, Jeannette M. ;
Neeren, Amy M. ;
Hughes, Megan E. ;
Iacoviello, Brian M. ;
Gerstein, Rachel K. ;
Keyser, Jessica ;
Urosevic, Snezana ;
Nusslock, Robin .
MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 2006, 30 (02) :143-155
[3]   The Role of the Behavioral Approach System (BAS) in Bipolar Spectrum Disorders [J].
Alloy, Lauren B. ;
Abramson, Lyn Y. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 19 (03) :189-194
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Bipolar disorder: assessment and management
[5]  
APA, 2013, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596.744053
[6]  
Basco M.Ramirez., 2005, COGNITIVE BEHAV THER
[7]  
Bryant F., 2003, J MENTAL HLTH, V12, P175, DOI DOI 10.1080/0963823031000103489
[8]   Tendencies Toward Mania and Tendencies Toward Depression Have Distinct Motivational, Affective, and Cognitive Correlates [J].
Carver, Charles S. ;
Johnson, Sheri L. .
COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 2009, 33 (06) :552-569
[9]   Clinical and therapeutic implications of predominant polarity in bipolar disorder [J].
Colom, F. ;
Vieta, E. ;
Daban, C. ;
Pacchiarotti, I. ;
Sanchez-Moreno, J. .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2006, 93 (1-3) :13-17
[10]   Predominant polarity in bipolar disorders: refining or redefining diagnosis? [J].
Colom, F. ;
Vieta, E. ;
Suppes, T. .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2015, 132 (05) :324-326