The Waste-Resource Paradox: Practical dilemmas and societal implications in the transition to a circular economy

被引:48
作者
Greer, Rachel [1 ]
von Wirth, Timo [1 ]
Loorbach, Derk [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Dutch Res Inst Transit DRIFT, POB 1738,Room T16-53, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
Waste and resource management; Circular economy; Transitions; Closing loops; Waste-resource paradox; Lock-in; ENERGY; EFFICIENCY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126831
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Union has vowed to transition from a linear to a circular economy (CE). Many innovations, new business models, and policies have begun to emerge to support the push for further institutionalizing CE practices. A large portion of these attempts are based on transforming a flow currently labeled as a waste stream into a value proposition, i.e. a resource. However, this ironically increases the risk of creating a demand for these waste streams, which thereby may become commodified. In this article, we unpack the inherent dilemmas and implications created by this phenomenon, which we define as the Waste-Resource Paradox (WRP). Understanding the WRP is highly relevant, as its manifestation may lead to situations in which the further establishment of "circular" practices may reinforce linear economy by sustaining a waste (over)production in the system or causing undesired social or environmental repercussions. This can tighten a lock-in of the existing linear structures counteractive to CE that have not been explicitly identified or explored to date. We observed that the WRP may evolve and morph throughout time, across boundaries or respective to different societal sectors. Based on our findings, we highlight the profound implications of the WRP for the future of circularity and the potential consequences for a transition to CE. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Life cycle burden-shifting in energy systems designed to minimize greenhouse gas emissions: Novel analytical method and application to the United States [J].
Algunaibet, Ibrahim M. ;
Guillen-Gosalbez, Gonzalo .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 229 :886-901
[2]   Quantifying the quality loss and resource efficiency of recycling by means of exergy analysis [J].
Amini, S. H. ;
Remmerswaal, J. A. M. ;
Castro, M. B. ;
Reuter, M. A. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2007, 15 (10) :907-913
[3]  
Andersen B., 2007, Business process improvement toolbox, V2nd
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, NOS News
[5]   Defining the rebound effect [J].
Berkhout, PHG ;
Muskens, JC ;
Velthuijsen, JW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (6-7) :425-432
[7]   Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review [J].
Camacho-Otero, Juana ;
Boks, Casper ;
Pettersen, Ida Nilstad .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (08)
[8]  
Campbell-Johnston K., 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, VX
[9]   Closed-loop recycling of plastics enabled by dynamic covalent diketoenamine bonds [J].
Christensen, Peter R. ;
Scheuermann, Angelique M. ;
Loeffler, Kathryn E. ;
Helms, Brett A. .
NATURE CHEMISTRY, 2019, 11 (05) :442-448
[10]  
Di Ciancia, 2017, CONSC WEL