Cardiac implantable electronic device infection: prevalence and risk factors

被引:0
作者
Ghazaryan, N. L. [1 ]
Khachatryan, A. H. [1 ]
Adamyan, M. Yu [2 ]
Hovakimyan, T. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nork Marash Med Ctr, Dept Arrhythmol, Yerevan, Armenia
[2] Nork Marash Med Ctr, Yerevan, Armenia
来源
NEW ARMENIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2022年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
CIED implantation; iInfection; Aantibiotic prophylaxis; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; MICROBIOLOGY; POPULATION; PREVENTION; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.56936/18290825-2022.16.4-96
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The number of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation procedures has increased dramatically in recent decades due to population aging and expansion of indications. At the same time, the number of cardiac implantable electronic device associated complications has increased too. Infection is a very important and heavy complication of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation, which significantly increases mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to estimate the risk of cardiac implantable electronic device infection in a group of patients who received an aggressive scheme of postoperative antibiotic therapy and compare this with the risk of infection in another group, where a mild antibiotic therapy scheme was used. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was performed. The study sample included 355 patients. Two antibiotic prophylaxis and wound follow-up protocols (mild and aggressive) were used. In this study the effectiveness of both methods to prevent a cardiac implantable electronic device related infection was compared. Results: The prevalence of infection was 3.5% in the group with mild scheme and 1.13% in the group with the aggressive scheme. The difference in two subgroups was not significant ( p=0,149). According to this study severe renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and thyroid dysfunction were found as significant predictors for having cardiac implantable electronic device infection. In participants who underwent a reimplantation and in those with postoperative hematoma the odds of having infection was higher, compared to patients with primary implantation and absence of hematoma. Age of participants with cardiac implantable electronic device infection was younger compared to patients without infection. Conclusion: According to this study there is no statistically significant difference on cardiac implantable electronic device infection between mild and aggressive antibiotic therapy schemes.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 101
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infection Procedure Versus Lifetime Risk
    Tarakji, Khaldoun G.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 5 (09) : 1081 - 1083
  • [32] Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device-Related Infection and Extraction Trends in the US
    Sridhar, Arun Raghav Mahankali
    Lavu, Madhav
    Yarlagadda, Vivek
    Reddy, Madhu
    Gunda, Sampath
    Afzal, Rizwan
    Atkins, Donita
    Gopinathanair, Rakesh
    Dawn, Buddhadeb
    Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya R.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 40 (03): : 286 - 293
  • [33] Leadless Pacemaker Infection Risk in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections: A Case Series and Literature Review
    Bertolino, Lorenzo
    Florio, Letizia Lucia
    Patauner, Fabian
    Gallo, Raffaella
    Peluso, Anna Maria
    Scafuri, Antonio
    De Vivo, Stefano
    Corrado, Carmelina
    Zampino, Rosa
    Ruocco, Giuseppe
    D'Onofrio, Antonio
    Durante-Mangoni, Emanuele
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (24)
  • [34] Chlorhexidine gluconate pocket lavage to prevent cardiac implantable electronic device infection in high-risk procedures
    Diaz, Juan Carlos
    Braunstein, Eric D.
    Canas, Felipe
    Duque, Mauricio
    Marin, Jorge Eduardo
    Aristizabal, Julian
    Nino, Cesar Daniel
    Bastidas, Oriana
    Hoyos, Carolina
    Steiger, Nathaniel A.
    Matos, Carlos D.
    Sauer, William H.
    Romero, Jorge E.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2023, 20 (12) : 1674 - 1681
  • [35] Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections: associated risk factors and prevention
    Rohacek, Martin
    Baddour, Larry M.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2015, 145
  • [36] Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections
    Leung, Steven
    Danik, Stephan
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2016, 18 (06)
  • [37] Microbiology of cardiac implantable electronic device infections
    Bongiorni, Maria Grazia
    Tascini, Carlo
    Tagliaferri, Enrico
    Di Cori, Andrea
    Soldati, Ezio
    Leonildi, Alessandro
    Zucchelli, Giulio
    Ciullo, Ilaria
    Menichetti, Francesco
    EUROPACE, 2012, 14 (09): : 1334 - 1339
  • [38] Preventing cardiac implantable electronic device infections
    Padfield, Gareth J.
    Steinberg, Christian
    Bennett, Matthew T.
    Chakrabarti, Santabhanu
    Deyell, Marc W.
    Bashir, Jamil
    Krahn, Andrew D.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2015, 12 (11) : 2344 - 2356
  • [39] Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, cardiac implantable electronic device, extraction, and the risk of recurrence
    Berge, Andreas
    Strand, Rasmus
    Nilson, Bo
    Naucler, Pontus
    Rasmussen, Magnus
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2022, 84 (05) : E67 - E69
  • [40] Safety and Efficacy of Submuscular Implantation With Resterilized Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device in Patients With Device Infection: A Retrospective Observational Study in Taiwan
    Chia-Meng Yu
    Chieh-Ming Yu
    Wen-Teng Yao
    Ying-Hsiang Lee
    Feng-Ching Liao
    Chih-Yin Chien
    Sheng-Hsiung Chang
    Hung-Wei Liao
    Yu-Fan Chen
    Wen-Chen Huang
    Kwang-Yi Tung
    Ming-Feng Tsai
    OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 9 (05):