Cardiac implantable electronic device infection: prevalence and risk factors

被引:0
|
作者
Ghazaryan, N. L. [1 ]
Khachatryan, A. H. [1 ]
Adamyan, M. Yu [2 ]
Hovakimyan, T. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nork Marash Med Ctr, Dept Arrhythmol, Yerevan, Armenia
[2] Nork Marash Med Ctr, Yerevan, Armenia
来源
NEW ARMENIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2022年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
CIED implantation; iInfection; Aantibiotic prophylaxis; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; MICROBIOLOGY; POPULATION; PREVENTION; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.56936/18290825-2022.16.4-96
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The number of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation procedures has increased dramatically in recent decades due to population aging and expansion of indications. At the same time, the number of cardiac implantable electronic device associated complications has increased too. Infection is a very important and heavy complication of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation, which significantly increases mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to estimate the risk of cardiac implantable electronic device infection in a group of patients who received an aggressive scheme of postoperative antibiotic therapy and compare this with the risk of infection in another group, where a mild antibiotic therapy scheme was used. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was performed. The study sample included 355 patients. Two antibiotic prophylaxis and wound follow-up protocols (mild and aggressive) were used. In this study the effectiveness of both methods to prevent a cardiac implantable electronic device related infection was compared. Results: The prevalence of infection was 3.5% in the group with mild scheme and 1.13% in the group with the aggressive scheme. The difference in two subgroups was not significant ( p=0,149). According to this study severe renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and thyroid dysfunction were found as significant predictors for having cardiac implantable electronic device infection. In participants who underwent a reimplantation and in those with postoperative hematoma the odds of having infection was higher, compared to patients with primary implantation and absence of hematoma. Age of participants with cardiac implantable electronic device infection was younger compared to patients without infection. Conclusion: According to this study there is no statistically significant difference on cardiac implantable electronic device infection between mild and aggressive antibiotic therapy schemes.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 101
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Burden and Risk Factors for Infection of Transvenous Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device: a Nationwide Cohort Study
    Yang, Pil-Sung
    Jeong, Jaehan
    You, So-Jeong
    Yu, Hee Tae
    Kim, Tae-Hoon
    Sung, Jung-Hoon
    Lee, Sang-Soo
    Park, Hyung-Deuk
    Joung, Boyoung
    KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2019, 49 (08) : 742 - 752
  • [22] Cardiac implantable electronic device infection: formidable, frustrating, and increasingly frequent
    Trohman, Richard G.
    POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE-POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ, 2017, 127 (09): : 579 - 581
  • [23] Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection: Detailed Analysis of Cost Implications
    Gitenay, Edouard
    Molin, Franck
    Blais, Sebastien
    Tremblay, Veronique
    Gervais, Philippe
    Plourde, Benoit
    Jacques, Frederic
    Steinberg, Christian
    Sarrazin, Jean-Francois
    Charbonneau, Eric
    Parent, Helene
    O'Hara, Gilles E.
    Champagne, Jean
    Philippon, Francois
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 34 (08) : 1026 - 1032
  • [24] Postimplantation pocket hematoma increases risk of cardiac implantable electronic device infection: A meta-analysis
    Kewcharoen, Jakrin
    Kanitsoraphan, Chanavuth
    Thangjui, Sittinun
    Leesutipornchai, Thiratest
    Saowapa, Sakditad
    Pokawattana, Apichai
    Navaravong, Leenhapong
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2021, 37 (03) : 635 - 644
  • [25] Efficacy of the antibacterial envelope to prevent cardiac implantable electronic device infection in a high-risk population
    Chaudhry, Uzma
    Borgquist, Rasmus
    Smith, J. Gustav
    Mortsell, David
    EUROPACE, 2022, 24 (12): : 1973 - 1980
  • [26] Risk of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients with Bloodstream Infection: Microbiologic Effect in the Era of Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography
    Chesdachai, Supavit
    DeSimone, Daniel. C. C.
    Baddour, Larry. M. M.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2023, 25 (08) : 781 - 793
  • [27] Effect of fibrotic capsule debridement during generator replacement on cardiac implantable electronic device infection risk
    Goldenberg, Gustavo R.
    Barsheshet, Alon
    Bishara, Jihad
    Kadmon, Ehud
    Omelchencko, Alex
    Strasberg, Boris
    Golovchiner, Gregory
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (01) : 113 - 118
  • [28] Impact of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection A Clinical and Economic Analysis of the WRAP-IT Trial
    Wilkoff, Bruce L.
    Boriani, Giuseppe
    Mittal, Suneet
    Poole, Jeanne E.
    Kennergren, Charles
    Corey, G. Ralph
    Love, John C.
    Augostini, Ralph
    Faerestrand, Svein
    Wiggins, Sherman S.
    Healey, Jeff S.
    Holbrook, Reece
    Lande, Jeffrey D.
    Lexcen, Daniel R.
    Willey, Sarah
    Tarakji, Khaldoun G.
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 13 (05)
  • [29] Infection and readmission rate of cardiac implantable electronic device insertions: An observational single center study
    Rahman, Riaz
    Saba, Samir
    Bazaz, Raveen
    Gupta, Vineet
    Pokrywka, Marian
    Shutt, Kathleen
    Bridge, Christine
    Yassin, Mohamed H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2016, 44 (03) : 278 - 282
  • [30] Cardiac implantable electronic device infections: From recognizing risk to prevention
    McIntyre, William F.
    Healey, Jeff S.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2017, 14 (06) : 846 - 847