Cardiac implantable electronic device infection: prevalence and risk factors

被引:0
|
作者
Ghazaryan, N. L. [1 ]
Khachatryan, A. H. [1 ]
Adamyan, M. Yu [2 ]
Hovakimyan, T. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nork Marash Med Ctr, Dept Arrhythmol, Yerevan, Armenia
[2] Nork Marash Med Ctr, Yerevan, Armenia
来源
NEW ARMENIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2022年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
CIED implantation; iInfection; Aantibiotic prophylaxis; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; MICROBIOLOGY; POPULATION; PREVENTION; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.56936/18290825-2022.16.4-96
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The number of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation procedures has increased dramatically in recent decades due to population aging and expansion of indications. At the same time, the number of cardiac implantable electronic device associated complications has increased too. Infection is a very important and heavy complication of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation, which significantly increases mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to estimate the risk of cardiac implantable electronic device infection in a group of patients who received an aggressive scheme of postoperative antibiotic therapy and compare this with the risk of infection in another group, where a mild antibiotic therapy scheme was used. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was performed. The study sample included 355 patients. Two antibiotic prophylaxis and wound follow-up protocols (mild and aggressive) were used. In this study the effectiveness of both methods to prevent a cardiac implantable electronic device related infection was compared. Results: The prevalence of infection was 3.5% in the group with mild scheme and 1.13% in the group with the aggressive scheme. The difference in two subgroups was not significant ( p=0,149). According to this study severe renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and thyroid dysfunction were found as significant predictors for having cardiac implantable electronic device infection. In participants who underwent a reimplantation and in those with postoperative hematoma the odds of having infection was higher, compared to patients with primary implantation and absence of hematoma. Age of participants with cardiac implantable electronic device infection was younger compared to patients without infection. Conclusion: According to this study there is no statistically significant difference on cardiac implantable electronic device infection between mild and aggressive antibiotic therapy schemes.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 101
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE INFECTION: PREVALENCE AND RISK FACTORS (A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE)
    Ghazaryan, N. l.
    Kachatryan, A. H.
    Adamyan, M. Yu.
    Hovakimyan, T. B.
    NEW ARMENIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 16 (04):
  • [2] Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients at Risk
    Tarakji, Khaldoun G.
    Ellis, Christopher R.
    Defaye, Pascal
    Kennergren, Charles
    ARRHYTHMIA & ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY REVIEW, 2016, 5 (01) : 65 - 71
  • [3] Risk factors associated with higher mortality in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device infection
    Kalot, Mohamad A. A.
    Bahuva, Ronak
    Pandey, Rohan
    Farooq, Waseem
    Mir, Ali
    Khan, Aalia
    Kerling, David
    Aftab, Hamza
    Kovacs, Alexander
    Gupta, Shilpi
    Smith, Morgan
    Tian, Lili
    Amuthan, Ram
    Sharma, Umesh C. C.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (03) : 738 - 747
  • [4] Cardiac implantable electronic device infection
    Lambert, Cameron T.
    Tarakji, Khaldoun G.
    CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 84 : 47 - 53
  • [5] Risk factors for cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Polyzos, Konstantinos A.
    Konstantelias, Athanasios A.
    Falagas, Matthew E.
    EUROPACE, 2015, 17 (05): : 767 - 777
  • [6] Cardiac implantable electronic device infection in the cardiac referral center in Thailand: incidence, microbiology, risk factors, and outcomes
    Korkerdsup, Theerawat
    Ngarmukos, Tachapong
    Sungkanuparph, Somnuek
    Phuphuakrat, Angsana
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2018, 34 (06) : 632 - 639
  • [7] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Prevalence and Risk Factors in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Malfunction
    Saeed, Abdullah
    AlShafea, Abdullah
    AlQthami, Monerah
    Bin Saeed, Abdulrahman
    AlAhmri, Foton A.
    AlQahtani, Norah S.
    Al-Muslat, Fatimah A.
    AlQahtani, Atheer
    JOURNAL OF THE SAUDI HEART ASSOCIATION, 2023, 35 (04) : 311 - 334
  • [8] Management of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection
    Podoleanu, Cristian
    Deharo, Jean-Claude
    ARRHYTHMIA & ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY REVIEW, 2014, 3 (03) : 184 - 189
  • [9] Epidemiology of cardiac implantable electronic device infections: incidence and risk factors
    Han, Hui-Chen
    Hawkins, Nathaniel M.
    Pearman, Charles M.
    Birnie, David H.
    Krahn, Andrew D.
    EUROPACE, 2021, 23 : 3 - 10
  • [10] Risk Scores for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection: Which One to Believe In?
    Malagu, Michele
    Donazzan, Luca
    Capanni, Andrea
    Sirugo, Paolo
    Rapezzi, Claudio
    Bertini, Matteo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (21)