Quantification of parametric uncertainty of ANN models with GLUE method for different streamflow dynamics

被引:21
作者
Tongal, Hakan [1 ]
Booij, Martijn J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Engn Fac, Dept Civil Engn, Isparta, Turkey
[2] Univ Twente, Fac Engn Technol, Dept Water Engn & Management, Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE); Parametric uncertainty; Bootstrap; Artificial neural networks; Uncertainty measures; Rhine Basin; NEURAL-NETWORKS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; PREDICTIVE UNCERTAINTY; RHINE BASIN; LOW FLOWS; ENSEMBLE; IDENTIFICATION; INFLOW; FEEDFORWARD; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-017-1408-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study describes the parametric uncertainty of artificial neural networks ANNs) by employing the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method. The ANNs are used to forecast daily streamflow for three sub-basins of the Rhine Basin East Alpine, Main, and Mosel) having different hydrological and climatological characteristics. We have obtained prior parameter distributions from 5000 ANNs in the training period to capture the parametric uncertainty and subsequently 125,000 correlated parameter sets were generated. These parameter sets were used to quantify the uncertainty in the forecasted streamflow in the testing period using three uncertainty measures: percentage of coverage, average relative length, and average asymmetry degree. The results indicated that the highest uncertainty was obtained for the Mosel sub-basin and the lowest for the East Alpine sub-basin mainly due to hydro-climatic differences between these basins. The prediction results and uncertainty estimates of the proposed methodology were compared to the direct ensemble and bootstrap methods. The GLUE method successfully captured the observed discharges with the generated prediction intervals, especially the peak flows. It was also illustrated that uncertainty bands are sensitive to the selection of the threshold value for the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency measure used in the GLUE method by employing the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.
引用
收藏
页码:993 / 1010
页数:18
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Neural networks for real time catchment flow modeling and prediction [J].
Aqil, Muhammad ;
Kita, Ichiro ;
Yano, Akira ;
Nishiyama, Soichi .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2007, 21 (10) :1781-1796
[2]   Improving Ann-Based Short-Term and Long-Term Seasonal River Flow Forecasting with Signal Processing Techniques [J].
Badrzadeh, H. ;
Sarukkalige, R. ;
Jayawardena, A. W. .
RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2016, 32 (03) :245-256
[3]   Impact of multi-resolution analysis of artificial intelligence models inputs on multi-step ahead river flow forecasting [J].
Badrzadeh, Honey ;
Sarukkalige, Ranjan ;
Jayawardena, A. W. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2013, 507 :75-85
[4]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[5]   Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology [J].
Beven, K ;
Freer, J .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2001, 249 (1-4) :11-29
[6]   An experiment on the evolution of an ensemble of neural networks for streamflow forecasting [J].
Boucher, M. -A. ;
Laliberte, J. -P. ;
Anctil, F. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2010, 14 (03) :603-612
[7]   Informal uncertainty analysis (GLUE) of continuous flow simulation in a hybrid sewer system with infiltration inflow - consistency of containment ratios in calibration and validation? [J].
Breinholt, A. ;
Grum, M. ;
Madsen, H. ;
Thordarson, F. Orn ;
Mikkelsen, P. S. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (10) :4159-4176
[8]   Multi-step-ahead neural networks for flood forecasting [J].
Chang, Fi-John ;
Chiang, Yen-Ming ;
Chang, Li-Chiu .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2007, 52 (01) :114-130
[9]   Uncertainty Intercomparison of Different Hydrological Models in Simulating Extreme Flows [J].
Chen, Xi ;
Yang, Tao ;
Wang, Xiaoyan ;
Xu, Chong-Yu ;
Yu, Zhongbo .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2013, 27 (05) :1393-1409
[10]   Comparison of static-feedforward and dynamic-feedback neural networks for rainfall-runoff modeling [J].
Chiang, YM ;
Chang, LC ;
Chang, FJ .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 290 (3-4) :297-311