Creating Shared Value Through an Inclusive Development Lens: A Case Study of a CSV Strategy in Ghana's Cocoa Sector

被引:16
作者
Ollivier de Leth, David [1 ]
Ros-Tonen, Mirjam A. F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Int Dev Studies, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Geog Planning & Int Dev Studies, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, NL-1018 VW Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Creating shared value; Inclusivity; Inclusive development; Cocoa; Ghana; Nestlé TRADE-OFFS; CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY; BUSINESS; ECONOMY; GENDER;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-021-04808-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Despite the widespread popularity of the Creating Shared Value (CSV) discourse, its 'business case' and 'win-win' rhetoric remain problematic. This paper adds an inclusive development perspective to the debate, arguing that analysing CSV strategies through an inclusivity lens contributes to a better operationalisation of societal value; makes tensions and contradictions between economic and societal value explicit and uncovers processes of inclusion, exclusion and adverse inclusion. We illustrate this by analysing Nestle's CSV strategy in its cocoa supply chains in Ghana based on content analysis of company documents, interviews with value chain actors and stakeholders, and focus groups with farmers. We ask how Nestle frames and implements its CSV discourse in practice and how this relates to the social, relational and environmental dimensions of inclusive development. Findings show how the company addresses inclusive development dimensions in its corporate discourse, practices and business operations, and what trade-offs it faces. We then unmask the inherent tension between business objectives and societal interests and explain why the scope, issues addressed and societal impacts of CSV remain constrained. We conclude that CSV can help reduce a company's impact on some persistent societal issues, but that its contribution to transformational change remains limited because the need to uphold competitive advantages and short-term financial performance narrows its ability to address all inclusivity dimensions. Legislation mandating responsible business conduct and due diligence can reduce this inherent tension by levelling the playing field between companies addressing inclusivity issues vis-a-vis those who do not.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 354
页数:16
相关论文
共 102 条
[11]  
Bradshaw, 2017, TELEGRAPH
[12]  
Bright C, 2020, EUI WORKING PAPER MW, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3262787, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3262787]
[13]  
Bryman A., 2012, Social research methods, V4th
[14]  
Buhmann, 2019, HDB BUSINESS LEGITIM, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_1-1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_1-1]
[15]  
Christensen LT., 2007, The debate over corporate social responsibility, P448
[16]  
Clarke J.S., 2015, The Guardian
[17]   Simulacra and Sustainability Disclosure: Analysis of the Interpretative Models of Creating Shared Value [J].
Corazza, Laura ;
Scagnelli, Simone Domenico ;
Mio, Chiara .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 24 (05) :414-434
[18]  
Crane A., 2014, CALIF MANAGE REV, V56, DOI DOI 10.1525/CMR.2014.56.2.130
[19]   The limits of the business case for sustainability: Don't count on 'Creating Shared Value' to extinguish corporate destruction [J].
de los Reyes, Gaston, Jr. ;
Scholz, Markus .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 221 :785-794
[20]   Beyond the "Win-Win": Creating Shared Value Requires Ethical Frameworks [J].
de los Reyes, Gaston, Jr. ;
Scholz, Markus ;
Smith, N. Craig .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2017, 59 (02) :142-167