Quality-of-life and quality-adjusted survival (Q-TWiST) in patients receiving lapatinib in combination with paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer

被引:15
|
作者
Sherrill, Beth
Di Leo, Angelo [2 ]
Amonkar, Mayur M. [3 ]
Wu, Yun [1 ]
Zvirbule, Zanete [4 ]
Aziz, Zeba [5 ]
Bines, Jose [6 ]
Gomez, Henry L. [7 ]
机构
[1] RTI Hlth Solut, MStat, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[2] Sandro Pitigliani Med Oncol Unit, Prato, Italy
[3] GSK Oncol, Collegeville, PA USA
[4] Riga Eastern Univ Hosp, Latvian Oncol Ctr, Riga, Latvia
[5] Allama Iqbal Med Coll, Lahore, Pakistan
[6] Natl Canc Inst, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[7] Inst Nacl Enfermedades Neoplas, Lima, Peru
关键词
Cancer; metastatic breast; ErbB2+; HER2; Lapatinib; Paclitaxel; Q-TWiST; Quality-of-life; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; TRASTUZUMAB; THERAPY; SAFETY; TRIAL; PLUS;
D O I
10.1185/03007991003590860
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In a phase 3 randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, first-line therapy with lapatinib plus paclitaxel significantly improved clinical outcomes based on a pre-planned analysis of ErbB2+ metastatic breast cancer patients (GSK Study #EGF30001; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00075270). Patients with ErbB2- or untested did not significantly benefit. This article focuses on the quality of life (QOL) and quality-adjusted survival outcomes (Q-TWiST) in the study. QOL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B). Changes from baseline were analyzed using ANCOVAs, repeated measures and pattern mixture modeling. The Q-TWiST method was used to examine the trade-off between toxicities and delayed progression. The study included 579 subjects, of whom 86 were ErbB2+. In the ITT population, no significant differences in QOL or Q-TWiST scores were observed. In the ErbB2+ subgroup, the lapatinib plus paclitaxel (L + P) arm demonstrated stable FACT-B scores over the first year, while average scores for patients on P + placebo (P + pla) monotherapy decreased (change from baseline: L + P, p = 0.99; P + pla, p = 0.01). Clinically meaningful differences were observed between treatment arms on the FACT-B, Trial Outcome Index and breast cancer subscale scores. Pattern mixture models suggested more QOL differentiation between treatments among patients who progressed or withdrew early. Q-TWiST differences between the arms in the ErbB2+ subgroup ranged from 2 to 15 weeks with an L + P advantage across all utility weight combinations. In the ITT population, results provide no evidence of QOL differences between treatment groups. In a small, prospectively-defined subgroup of ErbB2+ patients, L + P resulted in more stable QOL and more quality-adjusted survival than paclitaxel monotherapy, representing clinically important differences between treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:767 / 775
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality of life and quality adjusted survival for breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant therapy
    Diane L. Fairclough
    John H. Fetting
    David Cella
    Wendy Wonson
    Carol M. Moinpour
    Quality of Life Research, 1999, 8 : 723 - 731
  • [22] Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST): patient-reported outcome or mathematical model? A systematic review in cancer
    Tate, Wendy R.
    Skrepnek, Grant H.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 24 (03) : 253 - 261
  • [23] Quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease or toxicity and quality-adjusted progression-free survival with niraparib maintenance in first-line ovarian cancer in the PRIMA trial
    Barretina-Ginesta, Maria-Pilar
    Monk, Bradley J.
    Han, Sileny
    Pothuri, Bhavana
    Auranen, Annika
    Chase, Dana M.
    Lorusso, Domenica
    Anderson, Charles
    Abadie-Lacourtoisie, Sophie
    Cloven, Noelle
    Braicu, Elena, I
    Amit, Amnon
    Redondo, Andres
    Shah, Ruchit
    Kebede, Nehemiah
    Hawkes, Carol
    Gupta, Divya
    Woodward, Tatia
    O'Malley, David M.
    Gonzalez-Martin, Antonio
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 14
  • [24] Bevacizumab in combination with taxanes for the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer
    Chan, A.
    Miles, D. W.
    Pivot, X.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 (12) : 2305 - 2315
  • [25] Lapatinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone for HER2+(ErbB2+) metastatic breast cancer: quality-of-life assessment
    Zhou, Xiaolei
    Cella, David
    Cameron, David
    Amonkar, Mayur M.
    Segreti, Anthony
    Stein, Steven
    Walker, Mel
    Geyer, Charles E.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 117 (03) : 577 - 589
  • [26] Variance and sample size calculations in quality-of-life-adjusted survival analysis (Q-TWiST)
    Murray, S
    Cole, B
    BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (01) : 173 - 182
  • [27] Estimation of Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy of Patients With Oral Cancer: Integration of Lifetime Survival With Repeated Quality-of-Life Measurements
    Chung, Chia-Hua
    Hu, Tsuey-Hwa
    Wang, Jung-Der
    Hwang, Jing-Shiang
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2020, 21 : 59 - 65
  • [28] Adding bevacizumab to paclitaxel in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer
    Kevin R. Fox
    Current Oncology Reports, 2009, 11 : 5 - 7
  • [30] Quality-adjusted survival of nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone among treatment-naive patients with advanced melanoma: a quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis
    David F. McDermott
    Ruchit Shah
    Komal Gupte-Singh
    Javier Sabater
    Linlin Luo
    Marc Botteman
    Sumati Rao
    Meredith M. Regan
    Michael Atkins
    Quality of Life Research, 2019, 28 : 109 - 119