Injecting and removing suspicious features in breast imaging with CycleGAN: A pilot study of automated adversarial attacks using neural networks on small images

被引:22
作者
Becker, Anton S. [1 ,2 ]
Jendele, Lukas [3 ]
Skopek, Ondrej [3 ]
Berger, Nicole [1 ]
Ghafoor, Soleen [1 ,4 ]
Marcon, Magda [1 ]
Konukoglu, Ender [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Zurich, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Raemistr 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Comp Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[5] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Comp Vis Lab, Dept Informat Technol & Elect Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Mammography; Cancer; GAN; Cyber security;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108649
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To train a CycleGAN on downscaled versions of mammographic data to artificially inject or remove suspicious features, and to determine whether these AI-mediated attacks can be detected by radiologists. Material and Methods: From two publicly available datasets, BCDR and INbreast, we selected 680 images with and without lesions as training data. An internal dataset (n = 302 cancers, n = 590 controls) served as test data. We ran two experiments (256 x 256 px and 512 x 408 px) and applied the trained model to the test data. Three radiologists read a set of images (modified and originals) and rated the presence of suspicious lesions on a scale from 1 to 5 and the likelihood of the image being manipulated. The readout was evaluated by multiple reader multiple case receiver operating characteristics (MRMC-ROC) analysis using the area under the curve (AUC). Results: At the lower resolution, the overall performance was not affected by the CycleGAN modifications (AUC 0.70 vs. 0.76, p = 0.67). However, one radiologist exhibited lower detection of cancer (0.85 vs 0.63, p = 0.06). The radiologists could not discriminate between original and modified images (0.55, p = 0.45). At the higher resolution, all radiologists showed significantly lower detection rate of cancer in the modified images (0.80 vs. 0.37, p < 0.001), however, they were able to detect modified images due to better visibility of artifacts (0.94, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Our proof-of-concept study shows that CycleGAN can implicitly learn suspicious features and artificially inject or remove them in existing images. The applicability of the method is currently limited by the small image size and introduction of artifacts.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Abadi M, 2016, PROCEEDINGS OF OSDI'16: 12TH USENIX SYMPOSIUM ON OPERATING SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION, P265
[2]  
[Anonymous], RADIOLOGY
[3]  
[Anonymous], LUNG CANC
[4]  
[Anonymous], RADIOLOGY
[5]  
[Anonymous], BR J RADIOL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Nature, DOI [10.1038/nature14539, DOI 10.1038/NATURE14539]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CheXNet: radiologistlevel pneumonia detection on chest X-rays with deep learning
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2019, IEEE T EVOL COMPUT
[9]  
[Anonymous], BREAST CANC RES TREA
[10]  
[Anonymous], BACKGR ASS RUSS ACT