Intergroup relational identity: Development and validation of a scale and construct

被引:13
作者
Rast, David E., III [1 ]
van Knippenberg, Daan [2 ]
Hogg, Michael A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Drexel Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Claremont Grad Univ, Claremont, CA USA
关键词
intergroup relational identity; intergroup relations; organizations; scale development; social identity; SUBGROUP RELATIONS; SOCIAL IDENTITY; SELF-CONCEPT; METHOD BIAS; LEADERSHIP; IDENTIFICATION; ORGANIZATIONS; CONFLICT; CONSEQUENCES; PREJUDICE;
D O I
10.1177/1368430219883350
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In their theory of intergroup leadership, Hogg, van Knippenberg, and Rast proposed the novel concept of intergroup relational identity. An intergroup relational identity (IRI) refers to a form of social identity that is defined in terms of the cooperative and mutually promotive relationship between subgroups. This article outlines the development of a five-item scale to measure IRI. We conducted five studies with over 1,700 participants from different countries. The unidimensional factor structure of the five-item scale replicated across studies, and the latter three studies provided evidence of construct (convergent and discriminant) and criterion-related validity. Intergroup relations are often overlooked in organizational behavior and management research. However, our results support the idea that IRI affects intergroup or inter-team cooperation and collaboration, as well as leadership effectiveness-enhanced perceptions of an IRI is a promising way to reduce conflict between subgroups within a larger collective. To date, no measure of IRI has been published. These studies present the first empirical test of and support for the newly developed IRI measure, and provide evidence demonstrating the benefit of promoting an IRI for both leadership and intergroup relations more broadly.
引用
收藏
页码:943 / 966
页数:24
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Abrams D., 2010, SAGE HDB PREJUDICE S, P179, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446200919.N11
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, PERFORMANCE RM UNPUB
  • [3] Human research and data collection via the Internet
    Birnbaum, MH
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 55 : 803 - 832
  • [4] An Empirical Kaiser Criterion
    Braeken, Johan
    van Assen, Marcel A. L. M.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2017, 22 (03) : 450 - 466
  • [5] Who is this ''we''? Levels of collective identity and self representations
    Brewer, MB
    Gardner, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (01) : 83 - 93
  • [6] What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research
    Conway, James M.
    Lance, Charles E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 25 (03) : 325 - 334
  • [7] IDENTIFICATION IN ORGANIZATIONS: THE ROLE OF SELF-CONCEPT ORIENTATIONS AND IDENTIFICATION MOTIVES
    Cooper, Danielle
    Thatcher, Sherry M. B.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2010, 35 (04) : 516 - 538
  • [8] The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships
    Cross, SE
    Bacon, PL
    Morris, ML
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 78 (04) : 791 - 808
  • [9] Effects of dual identification and interteam conflict on multiteam system performance
    Cuijpers, Maarten
    Uitdewilligen, Sjir
    Guenter, Hannes
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 89 (01) : 141 - 171
  • [10] Coordinated Action in Multiteam Systems
    Davison, Robert B.
    Hollenbeck, John R.
    Barnes, Christopher M.
    Sleesman, Dustin J.
    Ilgen, Daniel R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 97 (04) : 808 - 824