Integrating Natural Capital into National Accounts: Three Decades of Promise and Challenge

被引:26
作者
Brandon, Carter [1 ]
Brandon, Katrina [2 ]
Fairbrass, Alison [3 ,4 ]
Neugarten, Rachel [5 ]
机构
[1] World Resources Inst, Washington, DC 20002 USA
[2] Alliance Biovers Int & Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Climate Act Program, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Coll London UCL, Inst Sustainable Resources, London, England
[4] UCL, Ctr Biodivers & Environm Res, London, England
[5] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
GLOBAL VALUE; BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENT; STANDARDS; FRAMEWORK; PROGRESS;
D O I
10.1086/713075
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Economists and ecologists have worked for decades on measuring sustainability by supplementing or adjusting traditional economic indicators such as GDP. Given the threats to humanity from climate change, environmental degradation, and biodiversity loss, it is vital to incorporate values of natural capital into national economic decision-making. This review focuses on how natural capital applications, historically applied from local to global scales, address national-scale concerns. However, natural capital data and accounts have been only partially developed in most countries, given a lack of common metrics and monetary values. Existing accounts are often incomplete in both the types of natural capital and ecosystems they include (e.g., water, land, different ecosystem types) and the values they measure (e.g., market vs. nonmarket values). While it is important to continue work to embed natural capital into national economic accounts, the need for practical tools to analyze environmental problems is more urgent. We review alternative options for incorporating natural capital into national-scale decision-making and make recommendations for countries where the data, capacity, and political will to conduct formal natural capital accounting are lacking.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 153
页数:20
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [1] The role of natural capital in supporting national income and social welfare
    Ambrey, Christopher L.
    Fleming, Christopher M.
    Manning, Matthew
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2016, 23 (10) : 723 - 727
  • [2] Anielski M, 2001, 4 BIENN C CAN SOC EC
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, Leader's statement-The Pittsburgh Summit-September 24-25 2009
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being, V5
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2016, ASSESSMENT REPORT PO
  • [6] Sustainability and the measurement of wealth
    Arrow, Kenneth J.
    Dasgupta, Partha
    Goulder, Lawrence H.
    Mumford, Kevin J.
    Oleson, Kirsten
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2012, 17 : 317 - 353
  • [7] Atkinson GilesD., 2017, PRICES ECOSYSTEM ACC
  • [8] Economic, land use, and ecosystem services impacts of Rwanda's Green Growth Strategy: An application of the IEEM plus ESM platform
    Banerjee, Onil
    Bagstad, Kenneth J.
    Cicowiez, Martin
    Dudek, Sebastian
    Horridge, Mark
    Alavalapati, Janaki R. R.
    Masozera, Michel
    Rukundo, Emmanuel
    Rutebuka, Evariste
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 729
  • [9] The SEEA-Based Integrated Economic-Environmental Modelling Framework: An Illustration with Guatemala's Forest and Fuelwood Sector
    Banerjee, Onil
    Cicowiez, Martin
    Vargas, Renato
    Horridge, Mark
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2019, 72 (02) : 539 - 558
  • [10] The concept of natural capital
    Barbier, Edward B.
    [J]. OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2019, 35 (01) : 14 - 36