Identifying pulmonary nodules or masses on chest radiography using deep learning: external validation and strategies to improve clinical practice

被引:55
作者
Liang, C-H [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Y-C [4 ]
Wu, M-T [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Garcia-Castro, F. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Alberich-Bayarri, A. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Wu, F-Z [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Dept Biomed Imaging & Radiol Sci, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Fac Med, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Clin Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Xiamen Chang Gung Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples R China
[5] Kaohsiung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[6] Hosp Univ Politecn La Fe, Radiol Dept, Valencia, Spain
[7] Biomed Imaging Res Grp GIBI230, Valencia, Spain
[8] QUIBIM SL, Valencia, Spain
关键词
CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; CLASSIFICATION; RADIOLOGISTS; WORKLOAD; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2019.08.005
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To test the diagnostic performance of a deep learning-based system for the detection of clinically significant pulmonary nodules/masses on chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a retrospective study of 100 patients (47 with clinically significant pulmonary nodules/masses and 53 control subjects without pulmonary nodules), two radiologists verified clinically significantly pulmonary nodules/masses according to chest computed tomography (CT) findings. A computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software using a deep-learning approach was used to detect pulmonary nodules/masses to determine the diagnostic performance in four algorithms (heat map, abnormal probability, nodule probability, and mass probability). RESULTS: A total of 100 cases were included in the analysis. Among the four algorithms, mass algorithm could achieve a 76.6% sensitivity (36/47, 11 false negative) and 88.68% specificity (47/ 53, six false-positive) in the detection of pulmonary nodules/masses at the optimal probability score cut-off of 0.2884. Compared to the other three algorithms, mass probability algorithm had best predictive ability for pulmonary nodule/mass detection at the optimal probability score cut-off of 0.2884 (AUC(Mass): 0.916 versus AUC(Heat map). 0.682, p<0.001; AUC(Mass): 0.916 versus AUC(Abnormal) : 0.810, p=0.002; AUC(Mass): 0.916 versus AUC(Nodule): 0.813, p=0.014). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the deep-learning based computer-aided diagnosis system will likely play a vital role in the early detection and diagnosis of pulmonary nodules/masses on chest radiographs. In future applications, these algorithms could support triage workflow via double reading to improve sensitivity and specificity during the diagnostic process. (C) 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 45
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Black, William C. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Fagerstrom, Richard M. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Sicks, JoRean D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) :395-409
[2]   The British Thoracic Society guidelines on the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules [J].
Baldwin, David R. ;
Callister, Matthew E. J. .
THORAX, 2015, 70 (08) :794-798
[3]   Workload of Radiologists in United States in 2006-2007 and Trends Since 1991-1992 [J].
Bhargavan, Mythreyi ;
Kaye, Adam H. ;
Forman, Howard P. ;
Sunshine, Jonathan H. .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 252 (02) :458-467
[4]   Error and discrepancy in radiology: inevitable or avoidable? [J].
Brady, Adrian P. .
INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2017, 8 (01) :171-182
[5]  
BROGDON BG, 1983, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V21, P633
[6]  
Cheng JZ, 2017, ELS MIC SOC BOOK SER, P247, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-812133-7.00009-0
[7]   Current Applications and Future Impact of Machine Learning in Radiology [J].
Choy, Garry ;
Khalilzadeh, Omid ;
Michalski, Mark ;
Do, Synho ;
Samir, Anthony E. ;
Pianykh, Oleg S. ;
Geis, J. Raymond ;
Pandharipande, Pari V. ;
Brink, James A. ;
Dreyer, Keith J. .
RADIOLOGY, 2018, 288 (02) :318-328
[8]   Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review [J].
Ciatto, S ;
Del Turco, MR ;
Burke, P ;
Visioli, C ;
Paci, E ;
Zappa, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (09) :1645-1649
[9]   Training and Validating a Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Computer-Aided Detection and Classification of Abnormalities on Frontal Chest Radiographs [J].
Cicero, Mark ;
Bilbily, Alexander ;
Dowdell, Tim ;
Gray, Bruce ;
Perampaladas, Kuhan ;
Barfett, Joseph .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2017, 52 (05) :281-287
[10]   Pitfalls in Chest Radiographic Interpretation: Blind Spots [J].
de Groot, Patricia M. ;
Carter, Brett W. ;
Abbott, Gerald F. ;
Wu, Carol C. .
SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 50 (03) :197-209