Integrating ecosystem services in landscape planning: requirements, approaches, and impacts

被引:46
作者
Albert, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Aronson, James [3 ,4 ]
Fuerst, Christine [5 ]
Opdam, Paul [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Environm Planning, D-30419 Hannover, Germany
[2] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Environm Polit, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Ctr Ecol Fonct & Evolut, UMR 5175, F-34293 Montpellier, France
[4] Missouri Bot Garden, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[5] Univ Bonn, Res Dev Ctr, Dept Ecol & Nat Resources Management, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
[6] Wageningen Univ, Land Use Planning Grp, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
[7] Wageningen Univ, Alterra Wageningen UR Nat & Soc Grp, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
GOVERNANCE; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-014-0085-0
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Despite growing knowledge of ecosystem services (ES), and heightened awareness of their political and socio-economic relevance, mainstreaming and implementing ES in landscape planning and decision-making are still in their infancy. The objective of this special issue, therefore, is to explore requirements for, approaches to, and potential impacts of, integrating ES in landscape planning and management. The issue includes three key research themes: (i) Requirements and interests of planners and decision-makers for integrating ES in different application contexts, (ii) Approaches to applying ES in (participatory) planning, and (iii) Potential impacts of integrating ES in policy and decision-making. These themes are addressed by 12 papers that refer to case studies in Africa, Australia, and Europe. Four lessons are highlighted: (i) Information on ES is considered useful by many practitioners, but the type, production and communication of ES information need to be adapted to the specific context of a planning case; (ii) A broad range of approaches are available for integrating the ES concept in (participatory) planning with different and complementary contributions to decision-support; (iii) Effectively integrating ES in planning requires careful scoping of the context, objectives and capacities; (iv) Integrating ES in planning can effectively support the co-production of relevant knowledge and the collaboration of diverse actors. A new research field of 'Planning-for-ES Science' is emerging which focuses on, among other issues, the critical evaluation of real-world case studies of applying the ES concept in different fields of practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1277 / 1285
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Albert C, 2014, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V29, P1301, DOI [10.1007/s10980-014-9990-5, 10.1007/s10980-014-0085-0]
[2]   Social learning can benefit decision-making in landscape planning: Gartow case study on climate change adaptation, Elbe valley biosphere reserve [J].
Albert, Christian ;
Zimmermann, Thomas ;
Knieling, Joerg ;
von Haaren, Christina .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2012, 105 (04) :347-360
[3]   Quantifying ecosystem services and indicators for science, policy and practice [J].
Alkemade, Rob ;
Burkhard, Benjamin ;
Crossman, Neville D. ;
Nedkov, Stoyan ;
Petz, Katalin .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 37 :161-162
[4]   Landscape services: the concept and its practical relevance [J].
Bastian, Olaf ;
Grunewald, Karsten ;
Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe ;
Walz, Ulrich ;
Wende, Wolfgang .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2014, 29 (09) :1463-1479
[5]   Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Harwood, Amii R. ;
Mace, Georgina M. ;
Watson, Robert T. ;
Abson, David J. ;
Andrews, Barnaby ;
Binner, Amy ;
Crowe, Andrew ;
Day, Brett H. ;
Dugdale, Steve ;
Fezzi, Carlo ;
Foden, Jo ;
Hadley, David ;
Haines-Young, Roy ;
Hulme, Mark ;
Kontoleon, Andreas ;
Lovett, Andrew A. ;
Munday, Paul ;
Pascual, Unai ;
Paterson, James ;
Perino, Grischa ;
Sen, Antara ;
Siriwardena, Gavin ;
van Soest, Daan ;
Termansen, Mette .
SCIENCE, 2013, 341 (6141) :45-50
[6]   Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services [J].
Burkhard, Benjamin ;
de Groot, Rudolf ;
Costanza, Robert ;
Seppelt, Ralf ;
Jorgensen, Sven Erik ;
Potschin, Marion .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 :1-6
[7]   Mapping recreation and aesthetic value of ecosystems in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt (northern Spain) to support landscape planning [J].
Casado-Arzuaga, Izaskun ;
Onaindia, Miren ;
Madariaga, Iosu ;
Verburg, Peter H. .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2014, 29 (08) :1393-1405
[8]   An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation [J].
Cowling, Richard M. ;
Egoh, Benis ;
Knight, Andrew T. ;
O'Farrell, Patrick J. ;
Reyers, Belinda ;
Rouget'll, Mathieu ;
Roux, Dirk J. ;
Welz, Adam ;
Wilhelm-Rechman, Angelika .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (28) :9483-9488
[9]   Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver [J].
Daily, Gretchen C. ;
Polasky, Stephen ;
Goldstein, Joshua ;
Kareiva, Peter M. ;
Mooney, Harold A. ;
Pejchar, Liba ;
Ricketts, Taylor H. ;
Salzman, James ;
Shallenberger, Robert .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (01) :21-28
[10]   Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making [J].
de Groot, R. S. ;
Alkemade, R. ;
Braat, L. ;
Hein, L. ;
Willemen, L. .
ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2010, 7 (03) :260-272