Assessment of physical parameterizations using a global climate model with stretchable grid and nudging

被引:38
作者
Coindreau, O.
Hourdin, F.
Haeffelin, M.
Mathieu, A.
Rio, C.
机构
[1] CEA, DASE, LDG SEG, F-91680 Bruyeres Le Chatel, France
[2] CNRS, IPSL, Lab Meteorol Dynam, F-75005 Paris, France
关键词
D O I
10.1175/MWR3338.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The Laboratoire de Meteorologie Dynamique atmospheric general circulation model with zooming capability (LMDZ) has been used in a nudged mode to enable comparison of model outputs with routine observations and evaluate the model physical parameterizations. Simulations have been conducted with a stretched grid refined over the vicinity of Paris, France, where observations, collected at the Trappes station (Meteo-France) and at the Site Instrumental de Recherche par Teledetection Atmospherique observatory, are available. For the purpose of evaluation of physical parameterizations, the large-scale component of the modeled circulation is adjusted toward ECMWF analyses outside the zoomed area only, whereas the inside region can evolve freely. A series of sensitivity experiments have been performed with different parameterizations of land surface and boundary layer processes. Compared with previous versions of the LMDZ model, a "thermal plume model," in association with a constant resistance to evaporation improves agreement with observations. The new parameterization significantly improves the representation of seasonal and diurnal cycles of near-surface meteorology, the day-to-day variability of planetary boundary layer height, and the cloud radiative forcing. This study emphasizes the potential of using a climate model with a nudging and zooming capability to assess model physical parameterizations.
引用
收藏
页码:1474 / 1489
页数:16
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Abdella K, 1997, J ATMOS SCI, V54, P1850, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<1850:ANSOTC>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]   The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program [J].
Ackerman, TP ;
Stokes, GM .
PHYSICS TODAY, 2003, 56 (01) :38-44
[4]  
Alapaty K, 1997, J APPL METEOROL, V36, P214, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<0214:SOABLP>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]  
ALBRECHT BA, 1979, J ATMOS SCI, V36, P90, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036<0090:AMOTTS>2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]  
ARAKAWA A, 1974, J ATMOS SCI, V31, P674, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<0674:IOACCE>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]   An evaluation of neutral and convective planetary boundary-layer parameterizations relative to large eddy simulations [J].
Ayotte, KW ;
Sullivan, PP ;
Andren, A ;
Doney, SC ;
Holtslag, AAM ;
Large, WG ;
Mcwilliams, JC ;
Moeng, CH ;
Otte, MJ ;
Tribbia, JJ ;
Wyngaard, JC .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1996, 79 (1-2) :131-175