Identification of accident scenarios involving scaffolding

被引:14
作者
Szostak, Mariusz [1 ]
Hola, Bozena [1 ]
Boguslawski, Pawel [2 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Bldg Engn, Fac Civil Engn, 27 Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego St, PL-50370 Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Wroclaw Univ Environm & Life Sci, Inst Geodesy & Geoinformat, Grunwaldzka 53, PL-50357 Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
Construction; Scaffolding; Fall from height; Accident scenario; Direct graph; Dijkstra algorithm; Process model; CONSTRUCTION-INDUSTRY; CAUSATION MODEL; SAFETY; FALL; INTERVENTION; PREVENTION; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103690
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The aim of the undertaken research was to identify the most frequently repeated accident scenarios in relation to accidents that involve scaffolding. The source of knowledge was accident documentation containing information on the circumstances of accidents, as well as their course and consequences. As part of the research, an IT Database (ITD) was developed, which involved accidents that occurred in Poland over the past five years which were related to work on scaffolding. An original graphical, mathematical and IT process model was developed in order to enable a large set of accidents involving construction scaffolding to be studied. Due to the fact that every accident proceeds according to a different scenario, a map of possible accident scenarios was developed and presented in the form of a directed graph. Graph algorithms, including the Dijkstra algorithm, were used to build the IT model. Based on the information contained in the ITD, the course of the accident sequence was analysed in the proposed graph. The most probable accident scenarios, the probability of their occurrence, and the course of the critical path were determined. The obtained results constitute a starting point for estimating the occupational risk associated with working on scaffoldings.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Ajith S., 2019, AIP Conference Proceedings, V2128, DOI 10.1063/1.5117985
[2]   Application of the Loughborough Construction Accident Causation model: a framework for organizational learning [J].
Behm, Michael ;
Schneller, Arthur .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 31 (06) :580-595
[3]   Storybuilder - A tool for the analysis of accident reports [J].
Bellamy, L. J. ;
Ale, B. J. M. ;
Geyer, T. A. W. ;
Goossens, L. H. J. ;
Hale, A. R. ;
Oh, J. ;
Mud, M. ;
Bloemhof, A. ;
Papazoglou, I. A. ;
Whiston, J. Y. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2007, 92 (06) :735-744
[4]   Causes of construction injuries: a review [J].
Birhane, Getnet Engeda ;
Yang, Li ;
Geng, Jichao ;
Zhu, Junqi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2022, 28 (01) :343-353
[5]   Numerical Models of Scaffolding Decks and Their Applications [J].
Blazik-Borowa, Ewa ;
Robak, Aleksander .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2017, 15 (7A) :979-989
[6]   Health Behaviours in Scaffold Use Risk Assessment Model - SURAM [J].
Bojar, Hubert ;
Silveira, Francisco ;
Rebelo, Mario ;
Czarnocka, Elzbieta ;
Czarnocki, Krzysztof .
ANNALS OF AGRICULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 26 (01) :138-142
[7]   Relationship between safety measures and human error in the construction industry: working at heights [J].
Bussier, Mathieu Jonathan Pascal ;
Chong, Heap-Yih .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2022, 28 (01) :162-173
[8]   Construction industry accidents in Spain [J].
Camino Lopez, Miguel A. ;
Ritzel, Dale O. ;
Fontaneda, Ignacio ;
Gonzalez Alcantara, Oscar J. .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2008, 39 (05) :497-507
[9]   Prevention of falls to a lower level: evaluation of an occupational health and safety intervention via subsidies for the replacement of scaffolding [J].
Carlos Rubio-Romero, Juan ;
Antonio Carrillo-Castrillo, Jesus ;
Gibb, Alistair .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INJURY CONTROL AND SAFETY PROMOTION, 2015, 22 (01) :16-23
[10]   Analysis of the safety conditions of scaffolding on construction sites [J].
Carlos Rubio-Romero, Juan ;
Rubio Gamez, M. Carmen ;
Antonio Carrillo-Castrillo, Jesus .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2013, 55 :160-164