Identifying mechanisms of change in a conversation therapy for aphasia using behaviour change theory and qualitative methods

被引:22
作者
Johnson, Fiona M. [1 ,2 ]
Best, Wendy [1 ]
Beckley, Firle Christina [1 ]
Maxim, Jane [1 ]
Beeke, Suzanne [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Div Psychol & Language Sci, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Homerton Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
conversation therapy; aphasia; behaviour change; ENGAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1111/1460-6984.12279
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: Conversation therapy for aphasia is a complex intervention comprising multiple components and targeting multiple outcomes. UK Medical Research Council (MRC) guidelines published in 2008 recommend that in addition to measuring the outcomes of complex interventions, evaluation should seek to clarify how such outcomes are produced, including identifying the hypothesized mechanisms of change. Aims: To identify mechanisms of change within a conversation therapy for people with aphasia and their partners. Using qualitative methods, the study draws on behaviour change theory to understand how and why participants make changes in conversation during and after therapy. Methods & Procedures: Data were derived from 16 participants (eight people with aphasia; eight conversation partners) who were recruited to the Better Conversations with Aphasia research project and took part in an eight session conversation therapy programme. The dataset consists of in- therapy discussions and post- therapy interviews, which are analysed using Framework Analysis. Outcomes & Results: Seven mechanisms of conversational behaviour change are identified and linked to theory. These show how therapy can activate changes to speakers' skills and motivation for using specific behaviours, and to the conversational opportunities available for strategy use. Conclusions & Implications: These clinically relevant findings offer guidance about the processes involved in producing behavioural change via conversation therapy. A distinction is made between the process involved in motivating change and that involved in embedding change. Differences are also noted between the process engaged in reducing unhelpful behaviour and that supporting new uses of compensatory strategies. Findings are expected to have benefits for those seeking to replicate therapy's core processes both in clinical practice and in future research.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 387
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   Interviewing people with aphasia: Insights into method adjustments from a pilot study [J].
Luck, Amy M. ;
Rose, Miranda L. .
APHASIOLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) :208-224
[22]   A written communication strategy for a speaker with aphasia and apraxia of speech: Treatment outcomes and social validity [J].
Lustig, AP ;
Tompkins, CA .
APHASIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (4-6) :507-521
[23]  
Michie S, 2014, The Behaviour Change Wheel: A Guide to Designing Interventions
[24]   The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions [J].
Michie, Susan ;
van Stralen, Maartje M. ;
West, Robert .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2011, 6
[25]   TELLING MORE THAN WE CAN KNOW - VERBAL REPORTS ON MENTAL PROCESSES [J].
NISBETT, RE ;
WILSON, TD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (03) :231-259
[26]  
Paulhus D. L., 2007, HDB RES METHODS PERS, P224
[27]  
Ritchie J., 2002, Analysing Qualitative Data, DOI [10.4135/9781412986274, DOI 10.4324/9780203413081_CHAPTER_9]
[28]   Conversation therapy for aphasia: a qualitative review of the literature [J].
Simmons-Mackie, Nina ;
Savage, Meghan C. ;
Worrall, Linda .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2014, 49 (05) :511-526
[29]   Treatment of aphasia through family member training [J].
Simmons-Mackie, NN ;
Kearns, KP ;
Potechin, G .
APHASIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (06) :583-593
[30]   Reformulating the definition of compensatory strategies in aphasia [J].
SimmonsMackie, NN ;
Damico, JS .
APHASIOLOGY, 1997, 11 (08) :761-781