Growth stimulation of dwarf peas (Pisum sativum L.) through homeopathic potencies of plant growth substances

被引:26
作者
Baumgartner, S
Thurneysen, A
Heusser, P
机构
[1] Univ Bern, KIKOM, Verein Krebsforsch Inst Hiscia, CH-4144 Arlesheim, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Insel Spital, Kollegiale Instanz Komplementarmed KIKOM, Bern, Switzerland
来源
FORSCHENDE KOMPLEMENTARMEDIZIN UND KLASSISCHE NATURHEILKUNDE | 2004年 / 11卷 / 05期
关键词
homeopathy; anthroposophy; plant growth regulators; gibberellic acid;
D O I
10.1159/000082149
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Background: Efficacy of higher homeopathic potencies is controversial. Universally accepted specific detection assays for homeopathic dilutions do not exist. Basic research has to develop a spectrum of standardized tools to investigate the mode of action and nature of homeopathic potencies. Objective: Can the shoot growth reaction of dwarf peas (gibberellin-deficient mutants) be regarded as evidence of treatment with homeopathic potencies of plant growth substances? Materials and Methods: Pea seed (Pisum sativum L. cv. Fruher Zwerg) is immersed for 24 hours in homeopathic potency or control solutions for soaking. Plants germinate and grow in a standard cultivation substrate under controlled environmental conditions. Shoot length is measured 14 days after planting. Results: A screening of homeopathic potencies (12x-30x) of four different plant growth substances revealed biological activity of certain potency levels of gibberellin and kinetin (p<0.05). Growth stimulation through gibberellin 17x (5x10(-18) M) was assessed in six independent replications; results confirmed those of the screening (p<0.05). The effect of gibberellin 17x seemed to weaken during the course of the experiments. Conclusion: The results back the hypothesis that homeopathic potencies of plant growth substances affect pea shoot growth. Dwarf peas might thus be an interesting system model for studying the action of homeopathic potencies. Further work is required to identify all boundary conditions modulating the reactivity of this system.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 292
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Albrecht H, 2002, Homeopathy, V91, P162, DOI 10.1054/homp.2002.0028
[2]  
[Anonymous], SCHRIFTEN MORPHOLOGI
[3]  
Arteca R.N., 1996, PLANT GROWTH SUBSTAN
[4]   Methodological standards and problems in preclinical homoeopathic potency research [J].
Baumgartner, S ;
Heusser, P ;
Thurneysen, A .
FORSCHENDE KOMPLEMENTARMEDIZIN, 1998, 5 (01) :27-32
[5]   Quality assessment of physical research in homeopathy [J].
Becker-Witt, C ;
Weisshuhn, TER ;
Lüdtke, R ;
Willich, SN .
JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2003, 9 (01) :113-132
[6]  
Betti L, 2003, Homeopathy, V92, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.homp.2003.08.014
[7]  
BORCHERT SJ, 1989, J PARENT SCI TECHN, V43, P67
[8]  
Brizzi M, 2000, Br Homeopath J, V89, P63, DOI 10.1038/sj.bhj.5800360
[9]  
Brown V, 2001, INFLAMM RES, V50, pS47
[10]   The dose determines the stimulation (and poison): Development of a chemical hormesis database [J].
Calabrese, EJ ;
Baldwin, LA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY, 1997, 16 (06) :545-559