Mixed-severity natural disturbance regime dominates in an old-growth Norway spruce forest of northwest Russia

被引:17
作者
Khakimulina, Tatiana [1 ,2 ]
Fraver, Shawn [3 ]
Drobyshev, Igor [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Southern Swedish Forest Res Ctr, SLU, POB 49, S-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
[2] Greenpeace Russia, Leningradsky Prosp 26-1, Moscow 125040, Russia
[3] Univ Maine, Sch Forest Resources, 5755 Nutting Hall, Orono, ME 04469 USA
[4] Univ Quebec Abitibi Temiscamingue, Forest Res Inst, 445 Boul Univ, Rouyn Noranda, PQ J9X 5EA, Canada
关键词
Boreal forest; Canopy gaps; Dendroecology; European spruce bark beetle; Forest continuity; Insect outbreaks; Natural disturbances; Northern Europe; BEETLE IPS-TYPOGRAPHUS; PICEA-ABIES FOREST; STAND STRUCTURE; POPULATION-DYNAMICS; AGE DISTRIBUTION; REGENERATION; MORTALITY; HISTORY; CLIMATE; FENNOSCANDIA;
D O I
10.1111/jvs.12351
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
QuesionsWhat were the long-term disturbance rates (including variability) and agents in pristine Norway spruce-dominated (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) forests? Have soil moisture conditions influenced disturbance rates across this boreal spruce-dominated forest? Were the temporal recruitment patterns of canopy dominants associated with past disturbance periods? LocationInterfluvial region of Northern Dvina and Pinega rivers, Arkhangelsk, northwest Russia. MethodsWe linked dendrochronological data with tree spatial data (n trees=1659) to reconstruct the temporal and spatial patterns of canopy gaps in a 1.8-ha area from 1831-2008, and to develop a growth-release chronology from 1775-2008. ResultsNo evidence of stand-replacing disturbances was found within selected forest stands over the studied period. Forest dynamics were driven by small- to moderate-scale canopy disturbances, which maintained a multi-cohort age structure. Disturbance peaks were observed in the 1820s, 1920s, 1970s and 2000s, with decadal rates reaching 32% of the stand area disturbed. ConclusionsThe overall mean decadal rate was 8.3% canopy area disturbed, which suggests a canopy turnover time of 122yr, with a 95% confidence envelop of 91-186yr. Bark beetle outbreaks (possibly exacerbated by droughts) and wind-storms emerged as the principal disturbance agents. Recruitment of both Norway spruce and downy birch was associated with periods of increased canopy disturbance. Moisture conditions (moist vs mesic stands) were not significantly related to long-term disturbance rates. The studied spruce-dominated boreal forests of this region apparently exhibited long-term forest continuity under this mixed-severity disturbance regime. These disturbances caused considerable structural alterations to forest canopies, but apparently did not result in a pronounced successional shifts in tree species composition, rather occasional minor enrichments of birch in these heavily spruce-dominated stands.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 413
页数:14
相关论文
共 70 条
[41]   A METHODOLOGY FOR ESTIMATING CANOPY DISTURBANCE FREQUENCY AND INTENSITY IN DENSE TEMPERATE FORESTS [J].
LORIMER, CG ;
FRELICH, LE .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 1989, 19 (05) :651-663
[42]  
Maslov A. D., 2010, IPS TYPOGRAPHUS DRYI
[43]  
McCarthy John, 2001, Environmental Reviews, V9, P1, DOI 10.1139/a00-012
[44]   Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? [J].
McDowell, Nate ;
Pockman, William T. ;
Allen, Craig D. ;
Breshears, David D. ;
Cobb, Neil ;
Kolb, Thomas ;
Plaut, Jennifer ;
Sperry, John ;
West, Adam ;
Williams, David G. ;
Yepez, Enrico A. .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2008, 178 (04) :719-739
[45]  
Moiseev V. S., 1987, FOREST TAXATION
[46]   Intermediate wind disturbance in an old-growth beech-fir forest in southeastern Slovenia [J].
Nagel, TA ;
Diaci, J .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 2006, 36 (03) :629-638
[47]  
Nevolin OA, 2005, LESNOY ZH, P7
[48]  
Nevolin O. A., 2007, HIST BACKGROUND SPRU, P85
[49]  
Ogibin B. N., 2009, NO CONIFEROUS FOREST, P108
[50]  
Peterson DW, 2001, ECOL APPL, V11, P914, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0914:PFIOSF]2.0.CO