Intra-peritoneal versus retropubic implantation of three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis: Patient-reported outcomes and complications

被引:2
作者
Natali, Alessandro [1 ]
Grisanti Caroassai, Simone [1 ]
Tasso, Giovanni [1 ]
Cito, Gianmartin [1 ]
Gemma, Luca [1 ]
Cocci, Andrea [1 ]
Sessa, Francesco [1 ]
Verrienti, Pierangelo [1 ]
Serni, Sergio [1 ]
Carini, Marco [1 ]
Delle Rose, Augusto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Careggi Hosp, Dept Urol, Largo Brambilla 3, I-50134 Florence, Italy
关键词
Implantation; reservoir; inflatable; penile; prosthesis;
D O I
10.1177/0391560320967876
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The role of reservoir position was investigated in this series of patients treated with three-pieces penile prosthesis implantation (PPI). The outcomes and the patients' reported quality of life after insertion of the balloon in the retropubic space, or the Retzius's space (SOR), were compared with the outcomes of patients who received an intraperitoneal implantation (IP). The study aimed to analyze how the anatomy of the SOR influenced the long-term results of PPI, especially in patients who have been previously exposed to pelvic surgery or radiotherapy. The SOR has usually been identified as ideal for concealing and protecting the reservoir; nevertheless, an increasing rate of patients that ask for a PPI do not conserve the typical favorable characteristic of the SOR. In these cases, the tissue alteration can cause a higher rate of undesired events and can impair the satisfaction from device use. In the recent literature, few articles focus on the topic of reservoir position and very poor information is available about the results of the IP insertion. Materials: Our cohort of patients was retrospectively inspected; the two different subgroups, according to the reservoir position (SOR or IP) were evaluated considering the pre-operative condition, the post-operative complication, the development of undesired events or uncomfortable sensations during the follow-up. The quality of life after PPI was observed as well, with a questionnaire specifically developed for patients treated with PPI. The surgical technique adopted for the intraperitoneal implantation was described. Results: The results of penile prosthesis functionality and patients' and partners' reported quality of life (QoL) showed similar results between the two groups but greater satisfaction in the relational domain of the questionnaires adopted was described in the IP subgroup. Conclusion: According to our observations, the IP reservoir insertion guarantees good functionality and lower rates of undesired events after PPI.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 331
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] EDITS: Development of questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction with treatments for erectile dysfunction
    Althof, SE
    Corty, EW
    Levine, SB
    Levine, F
    Burnett, AL
    McVary, K
    Stecher, V
    Seftel, AD
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1999, 53 (04) : 793 - 799
  • [2] Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction: results of the 'Cologne Male Survey'
    Braun, M
    Wassmer, G
    Klotz, T
    Reifenrath, B
    Mathers, M
    Engelmann, U
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2000, 12 (06) : 305 - 311
  • [3] A Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Quality of Life after Penile Prosthesis Implant: Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis (QoLSPP) To What Extent Does the Implant Affect the Patient's Life?
    Caraceni, Enrico
    Utizi, Lilia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2014, 11 (04) : 1005 - 1012
  • [4] Infrequent Reservoir- Related Complications of Urologic Prosthetics: A Case Series and Literature Review
    Cui, Tao
    Terlecki, Ryan
    Mirzazadeh, Majid
    [J]. SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2015, 3 (04): : 334 - 338
  • [5] Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
    Dindo, D
    Demartines, N
    Clavien, PA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) : 205 - 213
  • [6] Douglas S, 2016, OCHSNER J, V16, P492
  • [7] DROLLER MJ, 1993, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V270, P83
  • [8] A retrospective analysis of risk factors for IPP reservoir entry into the peritoneum after abdominal wall placement
    Gross, M. S.
    Stember, D. S.
    Garber, B. B.
    Perito, P. E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2017, 29 (05) : 215 - 218
  • [9] Guidelines on Male Sexual Dysfunction: Erectile Dysfunction and Premature Ejaculation
    Hatzimouratidis, Konstantinos
    Amar, Edouard
    Eardley, Ian
    Giuliano, Francois
    Hatzichristou, Dimitrios
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Vardi, Yoram
    Wespes, Eric
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (05) : 804 - 814
  • [10] Emerging Complications Following Alternative Reservoir Placement during Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement: A 5-Year Multi-Institutional Experience
    Hernandez, Jonathan Clavell
    Trost, Landon
    Kohler, Tobias
    Ring, Josh
    Traweek, Raymond
    Alom, Manaf
    Wang, Run
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (03) : 581 - 586