Using Implementation Science to Further the Adoption and Implementation of Advance Care Planning in Rural Primary Care

被引:14
作者
Nelson-Brantley, Heather [1 ]
Buller, Carol [1 ]
Befort, Christie [2 ]
Ellerbeck, Edward [3 ]
Shifter, Ariel [4 ]
Ellis, Shellie [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Sch Nursing, 3901 Rainbow Blvd,Mail Stop 4043, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med & Publ Hlth, Canc Prevent & Control, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
[3] Univ Kansas, Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med & Publ Hlth, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
[4] Univ Kansas, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
关键词
Advance care planning; implementation science; primary care; rural; PALLIATIVE CARE; OLDER-PEOPLE; GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS; DIRECTIVES; BARRIERS; LIFE; PERSPECTIVES; PERCEPTIONS; EXPERIENCES; SPECIALISTS;
D O I
10.1111/jnu.12513
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Purpose To analyze the literature on advance care planning (ACP) in primary care through the lens of implementation science, with a focus on implications for rural settings. Design Scoping review of the literature. Methods The Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, PsycINFO, and the Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection databases were searched for studies related to ACP adoption and implementation in primary care. The Theoretical Domains Framework was used to map the literature to 14 determinants that serve as barriers or facilitators to ACP. The Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors was used to analyze the stage of implementation for each of the included studies. Findings Four steps to ACP were specified: identification, conversation, documentation, and follow-up. Determinants were identified for each step, but studies largely focused on the conversation step. Professional role and identity, environmental context and resources, and emotion were the most frequently cited determinants in initiating conversations. The identification step was largely determined by behavioral regulation. For documenting ACP, environmental context and resource determinants were most prevalent. In the few studies that addressed follow-up, providers expressed a desire for electronic reminders as a behavioral regulator to follow-up. Conclusions While ACP has been shown to have patient, family, and societal benefits, its uptake in primary care has been minimal. Because ACP is a complex process that is highly context dependent, implementation science is critical to inform its successful adoption and implementation. Smaller healthcare networks, adaptable professional roles, trusted relationships, and tight-knit community might be important facilitators of ACP in rural primary care. Clinical Relevance Findings from this study can be used to accelerate ACP implementation in rural primary care.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 64
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors
    Aarons, Gregory A.
    Hurlburt, Michael
    Horwitz, Sarah McCue
    [J]. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2011, 38 (01) : 4 - 23
  • [2] Barriers and Strategies to an Iterative Model of Advance Care Planning Communication
    Ahluwalia, Sangeeta C.
    Bekelman, David B.
    Huynh, Alexis K.
    Prendergast, Thomas J.
    Shreve, Scott
    Lorenz, Karl A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 32 (08) : 817 - 823
  • [3] American Nurses Association Professional Issues Panel, 2017, Call for action: nurses lead and transform palliative care
  • [4] [Anonymous], UPIR CONV START KIT
  • [5] [Anonymous], GUID ADV CAR PLANN D
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1 INT C URB PESTS CA
  • [7] [Anonymous], ADV CAR PLANN GUID
  • [8] [Anonymous], DISCOVERING BARRIERS
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2012, DISSEMINATION IMPLEM, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199751877.003.0001
  • [10] [Anonymous], WHO FACT SHEET PALL