Detection of subtle abnormalities on chest radiographs after irreversible compression

被引:42
作者
Savcenko, V
Erickson, BJ
Palisson, PM
Persons, KR
Manduca, A
Hartman, TE
Harms, GF
Brown, LR
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Informat Serv, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Biomath Resource, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
images; storage and retrieval; radiography; technology; thorax;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.206.3.9494474
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of wavelet-based compression of posteroanterior chest radiographs on detection of small uncalcified pulmonary nodules and fibrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) of the chest was used to identify 20 patients with normal posteroanterior chest radiographs, 20 with a solitary uncalcified pulmonary nodule 1-2 cm in diameter, and 20 with fibrotic disease. A double-blind protocol for readings of original images and images compressed at 40:1 and 80:1 was analyzed by using the nonparametric receiver operating characteristic to measure differences in diagnostic accuracy and their statistical significance. RESULTS: There was no substantial differences in the overall diagnostic accuracy (measured by the area under the curve index) for both nodules and fibrosis between images compressed at 40:1 and 80:1 and uncompressed images. Readers tended to perform better on images compressed at 40:1 compared with uncompressed images. The "high-sensitivity" portion of the 80:1 compression curve for nodules was below that for the uncompressed curve, although this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Lossy compression of chest radiographs at 40:1 can be used without decreased diagnostic accuracy for detection of pulmonary nodules and fibrosis. There is no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy at 80:1 compression, but detection ability is decreased.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 616
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[21]  
METZ CE, 1986, INVEST RADIOL, V21, P720, DOI 10.1097/00004424-198609000-00009
[22]   OBJECTIVE IMAGE QUALITY MEASURE DERIVED FROM DIGITAL IMAGE POWER SPECTRA [J].
NILL, NB ;
BOUZAS, BH .
OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 1992, 31 (04) :813-825
[23]   An analytical look at the effects of compression on medical images [J].
Persons, K ;
Palisson, P ;
Manduca, A ;
Erickson, BJ ;
Savcenko, V .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 1997, 10 (03) :60-66
[24]  
SAID A, 1993, IEEE INT S CIRC SYST, P279
[25]  
SAYRE J, 1992, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1653, P232, DOI 10.1117/12.59528
[26]   MAKING FILMLESS RADIOLOGY WORK [J].
SIEGEL, EL ;
DIACONIS, JN ;
POMERANTZ, S ;
ALLMAN, R ;
BRISCOE, B .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 1995, 8 (04) :151-155
[27]  
STITIK FP, 1978, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V16, P347
[28]  
SWETS JA, 1982, EVALUATION DIAGNOSTI, P80
[29]   RADIOLOGIC IMAGE COMPRESSION - A REVIEW [J].
WONG, S ;
ZAREMBA, L ;
GOODEN, D ;
HUANG, HK .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1995, 83 (02) :194-219