Coevolution of robustness, epistasis, and recombination favors asexual reproductio

被引:35
作者
MacCarthy, Thomas
Bergman, Aviv [1 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Neurosci, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[3] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Mol Genet, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
关键词
evolution of sex; gene-regulatory networks; recombination modifier;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0705455104
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The prevalence of sexual reproduction remains one of the most perplexing phenomena in evolutionary biology. The deterministic mutation hypothesis postulates that sexual reproduction will be advantageous under synergistic epistasis, a condition in which mutations cause a greater reduction in fitness when combined than would be expected from their individual effects. The inverse condition, antagonistic epistasis, correspondingly is predicted to favor asexual reproduction. To assess this hypothesis, we introduce a finite population evolutionary process that combines a recombination modifier formalism with a gene-regulatory network model. We demonstrate that when reproductive mode and epistasis are allowed to coevolve, asexual reproduction outcompetes sexual reproduction. In addition, no correlation is found between the level of synergistic epistasis and the fixation time of the asexual mode. However, a significant correlation is found between the level of antagonistic epistasis and asexual mode fixation time. This asymmetry can be explained by the greater reduction in fitness imposed by sexual reproduction as compared with asexual reproduction. Our findings present evidence and suggest plausible explanations that challenge both the deterministic mutation hypothesis and recent arguments asserting the importance of emergent synergistic epistasis in the maintenance of sexual reproduction.
引用
收藏
页码:12801 / 12806
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1930, GENETIC THEORY NATUR
[2]   Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks [J].
Azevedo, RBR ;
Lohaus, R ;
Srinivasan, S ;
Dang, KK ;
Burch, CL .
NATURE, 2006, 440 (7080) :87-90
[3]   A GENERAL-MODEL FOR THE EVOLUTION OF RECOMBINATION [J].
BARTON, NH .
GENETICAL RESEARCH, 1995, 65 (02) :123-144
[4]   RECOMBINATION DYNAMICS AND THE FITNESS LANDSCAPE [J].
BERGMAN, A ;
FELDMAN, MW .
PHYSICA D, 1992, 56 (01) :57-67
[5]   MORE ON SELECTION FOR AND AGAINST RECOMBINATION [J].
BERGMAN, A ;
FELDMAN, MW .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1990, 38 (01) :68-92
[6]  
Bergman A., 1995, Complexity, V1, P57
[7]  
BERGMAN A, 1995, COMPLEXITY, V2, P49
[8]   MUTATION-SELECTION BALANCE AND THE EVOLUTIONARY ADVANTAGE OF SEX AND RECOMBINATION [J].
CHARLESWORTH, B .
GENETICS RESEARCH, 1990, 55 (03) :199-221
[9]   THE EVOLUTION OF SEX AND RECOMBINATION IN A VARYING ENVIRONMENT [J].
CHARLESWORTH, B .
JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 1993, 84 (05) :345-350
[10]  
ERDOS P, 1960, B INT STATIST INST, V38, P343