Direct-Current Stimulation Does Little to Improve the Outcome of Working Memory Training in Older Adults

被引:89
作者
Nilsson, Jonna
Lebedev, Alexander V.
Rydstrom, Anders
Lovden, Martin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Aging Res Ctr, Gavlegatan 16, SE-11330 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Univ, Gavlegatan 16, SE-11330 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
tDCS; brain stimulation; working memory training; cognitive training; transfer; FLUID INTELLIGENCE; MOTOR CORTEX; METAANALYSIS; HEALTHY; BRAIN; PERFORMANCE; MODULATION; PLASTICITY; HUMANS; BACK;
D O I
10.1177/0956797617698139
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The promise of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) as a modulator of cognition has appealed to researchers, media, and the general public. Researchers have suggested that tDCS may increase effects of cognitive training. In this study of 123 older adults, we examined the interactive effects of 20 sessions of anodal tDCS over the left prefrontal cortex (vs. sham tDCS) and simultaneous working memory training (vs. control training) on change in cognitive abilities. Stimulation did not modulate gains from pre- to posttest on latent factors of either trained or untrained tasks in a statistically significant manner. A supporting meta-analysis (n = 266), including younger as well as older individuals, showed that, when combined with training, tDCS was not much more effective than sham tDCS at changing working memory performance (g = 0.07, 95% confidence interval, or CI = [-0.21, 0.34]) and global cognition performance (g = -0.01, 95% CI = [-0.29, 0.26]) assessed in the absence of stimulation. These results question the general usefulness of current tDCS protocols for enhancing the effects of cognitive training on cognitive ability.
引用
收藏
页码:907 / 920
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Arbuckle J. L., 2014, AMOS VERSION 23 0
[2]   Enhancing Working Memory Training with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation [J].
Au, Jacky ;
Katz, Benjamin ;
Buschkuehl, Martin ;
Bunarjo, Kimberly ;
Senger, Thea ;
Zabel, Chelsea ;
Jaeggi, Susanne M. ;
Jonides, John .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 28 (09) :1419-1432
[3]   There is no convincing evidence that working memory training is NOT effective: A reply to Melby-Lervag and Hulme (2015) [J].
Au, Jacky ;
Buschkuehl, Martin ;
Duncan, Greg J. ;
Jaeggi, Susanne M. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2016, 23 (01) :331-337
[4]   Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis [J].
Au, Jacky ;
Sheehan, Ellen ;
Tsai, Nancy ;
Duncan, Greg J. ;
Buschkuehl, Martin ;
Jaeggi, Susanne M. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2015, 22 (02) :366-377
[5]  
Batuman Elif, 2015, The New Yorker
[6]   SYNTHESIZING STANDARDIZED MEAN-CHANGE MEASURES [J].
BECKER, BJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 41 :257-278
[7]   Individual Differences in Intelligence and Working Memory: A Review of Latent Variable Models [J].
Conway, Andrew R. A. ;
Kovacs, Kristof .
PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, VOL 58, 2013, 58 :233-270
[8]   INFLUENCE OF TRANSCORTICAL D-C CURRENTS ON CORTICAL NEURONAL ACTIVITY [J].
CREUTZFELDT, O ;
FROMM, GH ;
KAPP, H .
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 1962, 5 (06) :436-&
[9]   Prefrontal cortical contributions to working memory: evidence from event-related fMRI studies [J].
D'Esposito, M ;
Postle, BR ;
Rypma, B .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2000, 133 (01) :3-11
[10]   Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back [J].
Dayan, Eran ;
Censor, Nitzan ;
Buch, Ethan R. ;
Sandrini, Marco ;
Cohen, Leonardo G. .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 16 (07) :838-844