Dosimetric verification of a commercial collapsed cone algorithm in simulated clinical situations

被引:50
作者
Nisbet, A [1 ]
Beange, I
Vollmar, HS
Irvine, C
Morgan, A
Thwaites, DI
机构
[1] Raigmore Hosp, Dept Med Phys & Bioengn, Highland Acute Hosp NHS Trust, Inverness IV2 3UJ, Scotland
[2] Cookridge Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Leeds LS16 6QB, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Western Gen Hosp, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
dosimetric verification; collapsed cone algorithm; treatment planning systems;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2004.06.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: This work reports a detailed study carried out in two UK radiotherapy centres of the dosimetric accuracy of the collapsed cone algorithm of a commercial treatment planning system (Helax-TMS) in simulated clinical situations. Materials and methods: Initially the accuracy of the collapsed cone algorithm in homogeneous media is evaluated for an extensive set of simple and complex fields. Water, lung and bone substitute epoxy resin material were then used to assess the algorithm in inhomogeneous media and compare its accuracy with the pencil beam algorithm currently in clinical use. Finally a semi-anatomic phantom and an anthropomorphic phantom were employed to assess the dosimetric accuracy using simulated clinical set ups. Thermoluminescence dosimeter (TLD) measurements were made with the anthropomorphic phantom and ionisation chambers otherwise. Nominal 4, 6 and 15 MV photon beams were studied. Results: For most homogeneous cases agreement between measured and calculated dose is within +/-2% or +/-2 mm, In cases with heterogeneities and simulated clinical situations it is observed that the accuracy is also generally within +/-2% or +/-2 mm. Specific instances where the difference between measured and calculated values exceed this are highlighted. Conclusions: It can be concluded that in clinical treatment planning situations where lung is present the collapsed cone algorithm should be considered in preference to pencil beam algorithms normally used but that there may still be some discrepancy between calculations and measurement. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 88
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   A PENCIL BEAM MODEL FOR PHOTON DOSE CALCULATION [J].
AHNESJO, A ;
SAXNER, M ;
TREPP, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (02) :263-273
[2]   ANALYTIC MODELING OF PHOTON SCATTER FROM FLATTENING FILTERS IN PHOTON THERAPY BEAMS [J].
AHNESJO, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (08) :1227-1235
[3]   COLLAPSED CONE CONVOLUTION OF RADIANT ENERGY FOR PHOTON DOSE CALCULATION IN HETEROGENEOUS MEDIA [J].
AHNESJO, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (04) :577-592
[4]   Dose calculations for external photon beams in radiotherapy [J].
Ahnesjö, A ;
Aspradakis, MM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (11) :R99-R155
[5]  
AHNESJO A, 2000, P INT C US COMP RAD, V13, P227
[6]  
AHNESJO A, 1991, THESIS U STOCKHOLM
[7]   Application of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 23 test package for comparison of two treatment planning systems for photon external beam radiotherapy [J].
Alam, R ;
Ibbott, GS ;
Pourang, R ;
Nath, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (12) :2043-2054
[8]   An evaluation of epoxy resin phantom materials for megavoltage photon dosimetry [J].
Allahverdi, M ;
Nisbet, A ;
Thwaites, DI .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (05) :1125-1132
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1993, 50 ICRU
[10]   The impact of electron transport on the accuracy of computed dose [J].
Arnfield, MR ;
Siantar, CH ;
Siebers, J ;
Garmon, P ;
Cox, L ;
Mohan, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (06) :1266-1274