Fetal heart rate baseline computation with a weighted median filter

被引:25
作者
Boudet, Samuel [1 ]
de l'Aulnoit, Agathe Houze [1 ,2 ]
Demailly, Romain [1 ,2 ]
Peyrodie, Laurent [3 ,4 ]
Beuscart, Regis [5 ]
de l'Aulnoit, Denis Houze [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nord France, Biomed Signal Proc Unit UTSB, Fac Med & Maieut, UCLille, F-59800 Lille, France
[2] Lille Catholic Hosp, Obstet Dept, F-59020 Lille, France
[3] Biomed Signal Proc Unit UTSB, Yncrea Ecole Hautes Etud Ingenieur, F-59800 Lille, France
[4] I3MTO EA 4708, Orleans, France
[5] Univ Nord France, UDSL EA2694, CHU Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
关键词
Biomedical signal processing; Nonlinear filter; Fetal heart rate; Baseline; Deceleration; Median filter; Fetal acidosis; COMPUTER-ANALYSIS; GUIDELINES; VALIDATION; ALGORITHM; SYSTEM; LABOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103468
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Automated fetal heart rate (FHR) analysis removes inter- and infra-expert variability, and is a promising solution for reducing the occurrence of fetal acidosis and the implementation of unnecessary medical procedures. The first steps in automated FHR analysis are determination of the baseline, and detection of accelerations and decelerations (A/D). We describe a new method in which a weighted median filter baseline (WMFB) is computed and A/Ds are then detected. Method The filter weightings are based on the prior probability that the sampled FHR is in the baseline state or in an A/D state. This probability is computed by estimating the signal's stability at low frequencies and by progressively trimming the signal. Using a competition dataset of 90 previously annotated FHR recordings, we evaluated the WMFB method and 11 recently published literature methods against the ground truth of an expert consensus. The level of agreement between the WMFB method and the expert consensus was estimated by calculating several indices (primarily the morphological analysis discordance index, MADI). The agreement indices were then compared with the values for eleven other methods. We also compared the level of method-expert agreement with the level of interrater agreement. Results For the WMFB method, the MADI indicated a disagreement of 4.02% vs. the consensus; this value is significantly lower (p < 10(-13)) than that calculated for the best of the 11 literature methods (7.27%, for Lu and Wei's empirical mode decomposition method). The level of inter-expert agreement (according to the MADI) and the level of WMFB-expert agreement did not differ significantly (p=0.22). Conclusion The WMFB method reproduced the expert consensus analysis better than 11 other methods. No differences in performance between the WMFB method and individual experts were observed. The method Matlab source code is available under General Public Licence at http://utsb.univ-catholille.fr/fhr-wmfb.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Ayres-de Campos D, 2000, J Matern Fetal Med, V9, P311
[2]   FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Introduction [J].
Ayres-de-Campos, Diogo ;
Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2015, 131 (01) :3-4
[3]  
Boudet S., 2019, FETAL HEART RATE MOR, DOI [10.20944/preprints201906.0139.v1, DOI 10.20944/PREPRINTS201906.0139.V1]
[4]  
Boudet S., 2019, FETAL HEART RATE SIG, DOI [10.20944/preprints201907.0039.v1, DOI 10.20944/PREPRINTS201907.0039.V1]
[5]  
Cazares S.M., 2002, THESIS
[6]   BASELINE IN HUMAN-FETAL HEART-RATE RECORDS [J].
DAWES, GS ;
HOUGHTON, CRS ;
REDMAN, CWG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1982, 89 (04) :270-275
[7]   Automated fetal heart rate analysis for baseline determination and acceleration/deceleration detection: A comparison of 11 methods versus expert consensus [J].
de l'Aulnoit, Agathe Houze ;
Boudet, Samuel ;
Demailly, Romain ;
Delgranche, Aline ;
Genin, Michael ;
Peyrodie, Laurent ;
Beuscart, Regis ;
de l'Aulnoit, Denis Houze .
BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2019, 49 :113-123
[8]   Development of a Smart Mobile Data Module for Fetal Monitoring in E-Healthcare [J].
de l'Aulnoit, Agathe Houze ;
Boudet, Samuel ;
Genin, Michael ;
Gautier, Pierre-Francois ;
Schiro, Jessica ;
de l'Aulnoit, Denis Houze ;
Beuscart, Regis .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2018, 42 (05)
[9]  
de l'Aulnoit AH, 2016, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P3576, DOI 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591501
[10]  
Fuentealba Patricio, 2017, Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering, V3, P423, DOI 10.1515/cdbme-2017-0089