Test of scientific creativity animations for children: Development and validity study

被引:8
作者
Atesgoz, N. Nazli [1 ]
Sak, Ugur [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Anadolu Univ, Eskisehir, Turkey
[2] Western Univ, London, ON, Canada
关键词
Scientific creativity; Children; Animation; Assessment; Creativity; Factor analysis; TORRANCE TESTS; THINKING; ACHIEVEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; JUDGMENT; ABILITY; GENDER; FORM; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100818
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Creativity assessments currently in use are often are not engaging for young children. The current study employed a novel method, animations, for measuring children's scientific creativity. A new test of scientific creativity for K2 students, titled TOSCAC (Test of Scientific Creativity Animations for Children) was developed based on the theory of Scientific Creativity as Dual Search. Test items included short animated stories. Children watched the animations and then were asked to generate hypotheses and redesign experiments to satisfy hypotheses. The animated test was individually administered to 801 students. Exploratory factor analyses yielded a two-factor structure which accounted for 71 % of variance. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the factor structure, showing an excellent fit. Children's scores on the TOSCAC was significantly correlated with their scores on the SAGES 2. Higher-grade children scored significantly higher that lower-grade students on the TOSCAC. Internal consistency coefficients ranged from .79 to .88. The interscorer reliability ranged from .92 to .99. The study provides evidence for the use of the TOSCAC in assessments of children's scientific creativity.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: The question of its construct validity [J].
Almeida, Leandro S. ;
Prieto Prieto, Lola ;
Ferrando, Mercedes ;
Oliveira, Emma ;
Ferrandiz, Carmen .
THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2008, 3 (01) :53-58
[2]  
[Anonymous], NASEAT MAGAZINE
[3]  
Ayas, 2017, THESIS ANADOLU ESKIS
[4]   Objective measure of scientific creativity: Psychometric validity of the Creative Scientific Ability Test [J].
Ayas, M. Bahadir ;
Sak, Ugur .
THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2014, 13 :195-205
[5]   Domain Specificity and the Limits of Creativity Theory [J].
Baer, John .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 2012, 46 (01) :16-29
[6]  
BARTLETT MS, 1954, J ROY STAT SOC B, V16, P296
[7]   Differences in the development of creative competencies in children schooled in diverse learning environments [J].
Besancon, Maud ;
Lubart, Todd .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2008, 18 (04) :381-389
[8]   Preschoolers' "Animation" of Computer Games [J].
Bjork-Willen, Polly ;
Aronsson, Karin .
MIND CULTURE AND ACTIVITY, 2014, 21 (04) :318-336
[9]   Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: Subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions [J].
Chan, D ;
Schmitt, N .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (01) :143-159
[10]  
Chin M.K., 2015, CREATIVE ED, V6, P1391, DOI [https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.612139, DOI 10.4236/CE.2015.612139]