Pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis in a large study population

被引:3
|
作者
Budak, Ali Baran [1 ]
Gunertem, Orhan Eren [2 ]
Ozisik, Kanat [3 ]
Gunaydin, Serdar [3 ]
机构
[1] Baskent Univ, Alanya Practice & Res Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Fac Med, Sanatokulu Caddesi Selcuklu Konaklari 1,A2,Blok 6, TR-07400 Antalya, Turkey
[2] Medicalpk Ankara Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Univ Hlth Sci, Ankara City Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis; Pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis; Post-thrombotic syndrome; POSTTHROMBOTIC SYNDROME; VILLALTA SCALE; OUTCOMES; THROMBECTOMY; TINZAPARIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.11.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We have analyzed our single-center immediate and follow-up results in the management of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IFDVT) using pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PMCDT) to determine the safety, accuracy, and effects on quality of life and whether this treatment strategy prevents post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Methods: The cases of 230 patients who had undergone PMCDT to treat IFDVT from January 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The preoperative, operative, and postoperative variables, Marder scores, outcomes, and follow-up assessments with the Villalta score and venous clinical severity score were investigated. Results: Anatomic success was achieved for 95.2% of the 230 patients. The mean Marder score had decreased from 12.65 +/- 2.1 to 2.4 +/- 1.3 postoperatively (P < .01). Early recurrent thrombosis had developed in 13 patients (5.65%). The primary patency at the 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits was 94.0%, 87.2%, and 81.7%, respectively. From 1 to 6 months, the Villalta score had decreased from 8.32 +/- 4.14 to 3.43 +/- 0.61 and the venous clinical severity score had decreased from 4.0 +/- 1.8 to 1.82 +/- 0.36 (P < .05). No statistically significant difference was found in the PTS severity scores at 12 months of follow-up compared with at 6 months. The mean change in the venous disease-specific quality of life from baseline to 12 months was 29.41 +/- 1.99 (P = .029). The total recurrence rate was 19.63% at 1 year. Conclusions: For a select group of patients with acute IFDVT, the use of PMCDT and postoperative anticoagulation therapy offered significant reductions in clot burden, leg pain, and swelling, achieving a significant reduction in PTS severity scores at 6 months.
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 825
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis
    Liu, Fang
    Lue, Ping
    Jin, Bi
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 25 (05) : 707 - 715
  • [12] Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy Versus Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
    Tang, Tao
    Chen, Linyi
    Chen, Jinhui
    Mei, Tong
    Lu, Yongming
    CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS, 2019, 25
  • [13] Acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: does catheter-directed thrombolysis affect outcomes?
    Abd El-Mabooda, El-Sayed A.
    Sorour, Waleed A.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 39 (02) : 325 - 337
  • [14] Predictors of Clinical Outcomes of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Trial
    Thukral, Siddhant
    Salter, Amber
    Lancia, Samantha
    Kahn, Susan R.
    Vedantham, Suresh
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (10) : 1161 - +
  • [15] Catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis
    van Schouwenburg, Inge M.
    Kooistra, Hilde A. M.
    Veeger, Nic J. G. M.
    Meijer, Karina
    LANCET, 2012, 379 (9828) : 1785 - 1786
  • [16] Catheter-directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: helpful or hurtful?
    Comerota, Anthony J.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF HEMATOLOGY, 2015, 8 (02) : 131 - 133
  • [17] Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis: An Emerging Therapy for Deep Vein Thrombosis - A Case Series
    Aashish, Arumugam
    Ganesh, Balasubramaniyan Amirtha
    Karthikeyan, Selvaraj
    Giridharan, Srinivasan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 8 : S168 - S171
  • [18] Midterm outcome of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with stenting for treatment of iliac vein compression syndrome with acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis
    Jiang, Chuli
    Zhao, Yu
    Wang, Xuehu
    Liu, Hong
    Tan, Tze-Woei
    Li, Fenghe
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY-VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISORDERS, 2020, 8 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [19] Catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis
    Vedantham, Suresh
    CURRENT OPINION IN HEMATOLOGY, 2010, 17 (05) : 464 - 468
  • [20] Ultrasound-Assisted Versus Conventional Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis
    Engelberger, Rolf P.
    Spirk, David
    Willenberg, Torsten
    Alatri, Adriano
    Do, Dai-Do
    Baumgartner, Iris
    Kucher, Nils
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (01)