The Department of Health's research governance framework remains an impediment to multi-centre studies: findings from a national descriptive study

被引:19
作者
Kielmann, Tara
Tierney, Alison
Porteous, Rosemary
Huby, Guro
Sheikh, Aziz
Pinnock, Hilary
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Div Community Hlth Sci, GP Sect, Edinburgh EH8 9DX, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Hlth Social Sci, Ctr Integrated Healthcare Res, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1258/jrsm.100.5.234
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective We describe our experience of using the standard application form, designed to streamline applications for multicentre research, to seek approval from all primary care organizations (PCOs) in England and Wales to undertake a single telephone interview with a health service manager. Design We sent applications (n=316), by email to each PCO, or consortium of PCOs, attaching a completed standard application form, the 15 required documents, and the approval we had been granted by the lead NHS organization. We maintained detailed records of the responses to our application, subsequent correspondence, additional paperwork requested, and time spent on the approval process. Setting The UK Research Governance Framework, which regulates all research conducted in health and social care settings. Participants All PCOs in England and Wales. Interventions None. Main outcome measures Time taken to obtain approval to undertake a telephone interview with a health service manager. Results We were unable to establish contact with 13 (4%) PCOs. Six months after submitting our application we had received approval from 259/316 (82%) PCOs and were still awaiting a verdict from 41 (13%). The median time to approval was 56 days (IQR 42-72). Overall, an estimated 318 staff-hours were spent completing supplementary forms, providing additional information and chasing up dormant applications. Conclusions Recent initiatives to 'streamline' research governance approval have failed to address the problems that face researchers undertaking multi-centre studies. There is an urgent need to develop a simpler process that allows low risk research to take place without threatening staff morale and endangering the quality of the research outputs. In the meantime, we advise researchers to allow far greater time than might reasonably be envisioned to obtain research governance approval.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 238
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   The negative effect of red tape on research [J].
Boshier, A ;
Shakir, SAW ;
Telfer, P ;
Behr, E ;
Pakrashi, T ;
Camm, AJ .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2005, 14 (06) :373-376
[2]  
BYRNE G, 2005, NURSE RES, V13, P2
[3]   Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom - Good governance is needed [J].
Caan, W .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7466) :623-623
[4]   Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom - Research governance is about protection, not convenience [J].
Denholm, JT .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7466) :623-623
[5]  
Department of Health (UK), 2005, RES GOV FRAM HLTH SO
[6]   Ethics and research governance in a multicentre study: add 150 days to your study protocol [J].
Elwyn, G ;
Seagrove, A ;
Thorne, K ;
Cheung, WY .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 330 (7495) :847-847
[7]   Research governance - Research governance approval is putting people off research [J].
Galbraith, N ;
Hawley, C ;
De-Souza, V .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7535) :238-238
[8]  
Leese Brenda, 2005, J Health Organ Manag, V19, P494, DOI 10.1108/14777260510629698
[9]  
MESSER J, 2005, NHS R D FORUM NHS R
[10]  
*NHS, 2005, NHS R D FOR STAND NH