How peer influence shapes value computation in moral decision-making

被引:38
作者
Yu, Hongbo [1 ]
Siegel, Jenifer Z. [1 ]
Clithero, John A. [2 ]
Crockett, Molly J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Psychol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Lundquist Coll Business, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Moral decision-making; Social influence; Goal; Drift diffusion model; Bayesian hierarchical modeling; SOCIAL-INFLUENCE; VISUAL FIXATIONS; BEHAVIOR; MODELS; CONTAGION; CONFORMITY; PREFERENCE; DISHONESTY; ATTENTION; PREDICTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104641
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Moral behavior is susceptible to peer influence. How does information from peers influence moral preferences? We used drift-diffusion modeling to show that peer influence changes the value of moral behavior by prioritizing the choice attributes that align with peers' goals. Study 1 (N = 100; preregistered) showed that participants accurately inferred the goals of prosocial and antisocial peers when observing their moral decisions. In Study 2 (N = 68), participants made moral decisions before and after observing the decisions of a prosocial or antisocial peer. Peer observation caused participants' own preferences to resemble those of their peers. This peer influence effect on value computation manifested as an increased weight on choice attributes promoting the peers' goals that occurred independently from peer influence on initial choice bias. Participants' self-reported awareness of influence tracked more closely with computational measures of prosocial than antisocial influence. Our findings have implications for bolstering and blocking the effects of prosocial and antisocial influence on moral behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Goal contagion: Perceiving is for pursuing [J].
Aarts, H ;
Gollwitzer, PM ;
Hassin, RR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 87 (01) :23-37
[2]   Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis [J].
Abrahamse, Wokje ;
Steg, Linda .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (06) :1773-1785
[3]   Social influences as explanations for substance use differences among Asian-American and European-American adolescents [J].
Au, JG ;
Donaldson, SI .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOACTIVE DRUGS, 2000, 32 (01) :15-23
[4]   TRANSMISSION OF AGGRESSION THROUGH IMITATION O AGGRESSIVE MODELS [J].
BANDURA, A ;
ROSS, SA ;
ROSS, D .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1961, 63 (03) :575-&
[5]   The automated will:: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals [J].
Bargh, JA ;
Gollwitzer, PM ;
Lee-Chai, A ;
Barndollar, K ;
Trötschel, R .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (06) :1014-1027
[6]   Co-evolution of cooperation and cognition: the impact of imperfect deliberation and context-sensitive intuition [J].
Bear, Adam ;
Kagan, Ari ;
Rand, David G. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 284 (1851)
[7]   On the importance of avoiding shortcuts in applying cognitive models to hierarchical data [J].
Boehm, Udo ;
Marsman, Maarten ;
Matzke, Dora ;
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2018, 50 (04) :1614-1631
[8]   Motivated misremembering of selfish decisions [J].
Carlson, Ryan W. ;
Marechal, Michel Andre ;
Oud, Bastiaan ;
Fehr, Ernst ;
Crockett, Molly J. .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01)
[9]   The Antecedents and Consequences of Human Behavioral Mimicry [J].
Chartrand, Tanya L. ;
Lakin, Jessica L. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 64, 2013, 64 :285-308
[10]   The Chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction [J].
Chartrand, TL ;
Bargh, JA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 76 (06) :893-910