Comparison of the return-to-the-origin probability and the apparent diffusion coefficient of water as indicators of necrosis in RIF-1 tumors

被引:13
作者
Helmer, KG
Meiler, MR
Sotak, CH
Petruccelli, JD
机构
[1] Worcester Polytech Inst, Dept Biomed Engn, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
[2] Worcester Polytech Inst, Dept Chem & Biochem, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
[3] Worcester Polytech Inst, Dept Math Sci, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
关键词
diffusion; tumor; necrosis; ADC;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.10400
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Two model-independent measures of diffusion, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and return-to-the-origin probability enhancement (R) were compared for their ability to detect tissue necrosis in RIF-1 murine tumors. Both reflect the degree of restriction experienced by the endogenous water molecules; however, the ADC is calculated from the initial linear slope of the diffusion attenuation curve, while R is calculated from data that includes the non-monoexponential part of the curve. In spectroscopic studies (n = 9), neither the ADC nor R showed a strong correlation with tumor volume. In imaging studies (n = 14), ADC, R, and T-2 were calculated on a pixel-by-pixel basis. There, the mean ADC and mean R for the entire imaging slice showed reasonable correlation with necrotic tumor fraction (r(2) = 0.679 and -0.665, respectively). The mean T2 value yielded a poor correlation (r(2) = 0.436). Regions-of-interest were chosen from areas identified as either necrotic or viable and the resulting sets of ADC and R-values were subjected to discriminant analysis to determine the identification error rate. The error was greater for R than for the ADC (P < 0.001). Therefore, in this application, the use of the non-monoexponential part of the diffusion attenuation curve does not provide additional identification power. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 478
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Agresti A., 1990, Analysis of categorical data
[2]   Non-mono-exponential attenuation of water and N-acetyl aspartate signals due to diffusion in brain tissue [J].
Assaf, Y ;
Cohen, Y .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1998, 131 (01) :69-85
[3]  
CARANO RAD, 2002, P 10 ANN M ISMRM HON, P46
[4]   TUMOR MEASUREMENT IN THE NUDE-MOUSE [J].
EUHUS, DM ;
HUDD, C ;
LAREGINA, M ;
JOHNSON, FE .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1986, 31 (04) :229-234
[5]   The application of porous-media theory to the investigation of time-dependent diffusion in in vivo systems [J].
Helmer, KG ;
Dardzinski, BJ ;
Sotak, CH .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 1995, 8 (7-8) :297-306
[6]  
JAIN RK, 1988, CANCER RES, V48, P2641
[7]  
JAIN RK, 1996, ANN BIOMED ENG, V24, P4457
[8]   RELAXOGRAPHIC IMAGING [J].
LABADIE, C ;
LEE, JH ;
VETEK, G ;
SPRINGER, CS .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SERIES B, 1994, 105 (02) :99-112
[9]   IMPROVED PFG STIMULATED-ECHO METHOD FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF DIFFUSION IN INHOMOGENEOUS FIELDS [J].
LATOUR, LL ;
LI, LM ;
SOTAK, CH .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SERIES B, 1993, 101 (01) :72-77
[10]  
LESS JR, 1991, CANCER RES, V51, P265