Evaluation of a known breast cancer using an abbreviated breast MRI protocol: Correlation of imaging characteristics and pathology with lesion detection and conspicuity

被引:111
作者
Heacock, Laura [1 ]
Melsaether, Amy N. [1 ]
Heller, Samantha L. [1 ]
Gao, Yiming [1 ]
Pysarenko, Kristine M. [1 ]
Babb, James S. [1 ]
Kim, Sungheon G. [1 ,2 ]
Moy, Linda [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Bernard & Irene Schwartz Ctr Biomed Imaging, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU, Sch Med, Ctr Adv Imaging Innovat & Res CAI2R, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
Breast MRI; Abbreviated MRI protocol; Breast cancer screening; TEMPORAL RESOLUTION; FAMILIAL RISK; MAMMOGRAPHY; WOMEN; ULTRASOUND; FEATURES; ENHANCEMENT; RECOMMENDATIONS; TOMOSYNTHESIS; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.01.005
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: This study evaluates use of an abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging protocol with T2 weighted imaging in detecting biopsy-proven unifocal breast cancer. Materials and methods: This is an institutional review board approved retrospective study of patients with biopsy-proven unifocal breast cancer (88% invasive; 12% in situ) undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. In three separate sessions, three breast imagers evaluated (1) T1-weighted non-contrast, post-contrast and post-contrast subtracted images, (2) T1-weighted images with clinical history and prior imaging, and (3) T1-weighted images and T2-weighted images with clinical history and prior imaging. Protocols were compared for cancer detection, reading time and lesion conspicuity. An independent breast radiologist retrospectively analyzed initial enhancement ratio of cancers and retrospectively reviewed lesion morphology and final pathology. Results: All 107 cancers were identified at first protocol by at least one reader; five cancers were missed by either one or two readers. One cancer was missed by one reader at protocols two and three. Mean percentage detection for protocol one was 97.8%; protocol two, 99.4%, protocol three, 99.4%. T2-weighted images did not alter cancer detection but increased lesion conspicuity for 2/3 readers. 3/5 missed lesions were low grade cancers. Initial enhancement ratio was positively associated with increasing tumor grade (p = 0.031) and pathology (p = 0.002). Reader interpretation time decreased and lesion conspicuity increased as initial enhancement ratio increased. Conclusion: Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging has high rate of detection for known breast cancer and short interpretation time. T2 weighted imaging increased lesion conspicuity without altering detection rate. Initial enhancement ratio correlated with invasive disease and tumor grade. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 823
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Breast MRI: Are T2 IR sequences useful in the evaluation of breast lesions? [J].
Ballesio, Laura ;
Savelli, Sara ;
Angeletti, Marco ;
Porfiri, Lucio Maria ;
D'Ambrosio, Ilaria ;
Maggi, Claudia ;
Di Castro, Elisabetta ;
Bennati, Paolo ;
Fanelli, Gloria Pasqua ;
Vestri, Anna Rita ;
Manganaro, Lucia .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 71 (01) :96-101
[2]   Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Blume, Jeffrey D. ;
Cormack, Jean B. ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. ;
Lehrer, Daniel ;
Bohm-Velez, Marcela ;
Pisano, Etta D. ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Evans, W. Phil ;
Morton, Marilyn J. ;
Mahoney, Mary C. ;
Larsen, Linda Hovanessian ;
Barr, Richard G. ;
Farria, Dione M. ;
Marques, Helga S. ;
Boparai, Karan .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (18) :2151-2163
[3]   Detection of Breast Cancer With Addition of Annual Screening Ultrasound or a Single Screening MRI to Mammography in Women With Elevated Breast Cancer Risk [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Zhang, Zheng ;
Lehrer, Daniel ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Pisano, Etta D. ;
Barr, Richard G. ;
Boehm-Velez, Marcela ;
Mahoney, Mary C. ;
Evans, W. Phil, III ;
Larsen, Linda H. ;
Morton, Marilyn J. ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. ;
Farria, Dione M. ;
Cormack, Jean B. ;
Marques, Helga S. ;
Adams, Amanda ;
Yeh, Nolin M. ;
Gabrielli, Glenna .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (13) :1394-1404
[4]   Breast MRI Screening of Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer [J].
Brennan, Sandra ;
Liberman, Laura ;
Dershaw, D. David ;
Morris, Elizabeth .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (02) :510-516
[5]   Breast lesions: Correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis [J].
Buadu, LD ;
Murakami, J ;
Murayama, S ;
Hashiguchi, N ;
Sakai, S ;
Masuda, K ;
Toyoshima, S ;
Kuroki, S ;
Ohno, S .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 200 (03) :639-649
[6]   Additional findings at preoperative breast MRI: the value of second-look digital breast tomosynthesis [J].
Clauser, Paola ;
Carbonaro, Luca A. ;
Pancot, Martina ;
Girometti, Rossano ;
Bazzocchi, Massimo ;
Zuiani, Chiara ;
Sardanelli, Francesco .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (10) :2830-2839
[7]   Clinical Performance Metrics of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With 2D Digital Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Community Practice [J].
Greenberg, Julianne S. ;
Javitt, Marcia C. ;
Katzen, Jason ;
Michael, Sara ;
Holland, Agnes E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 203 (03) :687-693
[8]   Abbreviated Screening Protocol for Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study [J].
Grimm, Lars J. ;
Soo, Mary S. ;
Yoon, Sora ;
Kim, Connie ;
Ghate, Sujata V. ;
Johnson, Karen S. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (09) :1157-1162
[9]   Differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions using magnetization transfer imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [J].
Heller, Samantha L. ;
Moy, Linda ;
Lavianlivi, Sherlin ;
Moccaldi, Melanie ;
Kim, Sungheon .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 37 (01) :138-145
[10]   Screening US in Patients with Mammographically Dense Breasts: Initial Experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41 [J].
Hooley, Regina J. ;
Greenberg, Kathryn L. ;
Stackhouse, Rebecca M. ;
Geisel, Jaime L. ;
Butler, Reni S. ;
Philpotts, Liane E. .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (01) :59-69