How broad are thematic roles? Evidence from structural priming

被引:31
作者
Ziegler, Jayden [1 ]
Snedeker, Jesse [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, 33 Kirkland St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Structural priming; Thematic roles; Dative alternation; Locative alternation; Animacy; WORD-ORDER; LEXICAL BOOST; REPRESENTATIONS; COMPREHENSION; ANIMACY; ENGLISH; OBJECT; VERBS; GOAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.019
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Verbs that are similar in meaning tend to occur in the same syntactic structures. For example, give and hand, which denote transfer of possession, both appear in the prepositional-object construction: "The child gave/handed the ball to the dog." We can call the child a "giver" in one case and a "hander" in the other, or we can refer to her more generally as the agent, or doer of the action. Similarly, the dog can be called the recipient, and the ball, the theme. These generalized notions of agent, recipient, and theme are known as thematic roles. An important theoretical question for linguists and psycholinguists is what the set of thematic roles is. Are there a small number of very broad roles, perhaps with each one mapping onto a single canonical syntactic position? Or are there many distinct roles, several mapping to the same syntactic position but conveying subtly different meanings? We investigate this question across eleven structural priming experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk (total N = 2914), asking whether speakers treat the thematic roles recipient and destination (i.e., location or spatial goal) as interchangeable, suggesting the broad role of goal, or distinct, suggesting two separate roles. To do so, we look for priming between dative sentences (e.g., "The man gave the ball to the dog"), which have a recipient role (dog), and locative sentences (e.g., "The man loaded hay onto the wagon"), which instead have a destination role (wagon). Our pattern of findings confirms that thematic role mappings can be primed independent of syntactic structure, lexical content, and animacy. However, we find that this priming does not extend from destinations to recipients (or vice versa), providing evidence that these two roles are distinct.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 240
页数:20
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, INTRO ARGUMENTS, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/9780262162548.001.0001
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing
[3]  
[Anonymous], THE GRAMMAR OF CASE
[4]   Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items [J].
Baayen, R. H. ;
Davidson, D. J. ;
Bates, D. M. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) :390-412
[5]  
Baayen R.H., 2007, Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, P69
[6]  
Baker M.C., 1996, Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, P7
[7]   Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal [J].
Barr, Dale J. ;
Levy, Roger ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Tily, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) :255-278
[8]   An Aspectual Analysis of Ditransitive Verbs of Caused Possession in English [J].
Beavers, John .
JOURNAL OF SEMANTICS, 2011, 28 (01) :1-54
[9]   The "sense boost" to dative priming: Evidence for sense-specific verb-structure links [J].
Bernolet, Sarah ;
Colleman, Timothy ;
Hartsuiker, Robert J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2014, 76 :113-126
[10]   Persistence of emphasis in language production: A cross-linguistic approach [J].
Bernolet, Sarah ;
Hartsuiker, Robert J. ;
Pickering, Martin J. .
COGNITION, 2009, 112 (02) :300-317