Development and preliminary psychometric properties of the Care Experience Feedback Improvement Tool (CEFIT)

被引:12
作者
Beattie, Michelle [1 ]
Shepherd, Ashley [2 ]
Lauder, William [3 ]
Atherton, Iain [4 ]
Cowie, Julie [2 ]
Murphy, Douglas J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stirling, Sch Hlth Sci, Ctr Hlth Sci, Inverness, Scotland
[2] Univ Stirling, Sch Hlth Sci, Stirling, Scotland
[3] Univ S Florida, Coll Nursing, South Florida, FL USA
[4] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Social Care, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] Univ Dundee, Qual Safety & Informat Res Grp, Dundee, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2016年 / 6卷 / 06期
关键词
patient experience; patient satisfaction; instrument; questionnaire; survey; PATIENT EXPERIENCES; SHORT-FORM; QUESTIONNAIRE; QUALITY; SATISFACTION; VALIDITY; SCALE; RELIABILITY; INSTRUMENTS; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010101
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To develop a structurally valid and reliable, yet brief measure of patient experience of hospital quality of care, the Care Experience Feedback Improvement Tool (CEFIT). Also, to examine aspects of utility of CEFIT. Background Measuring quality improvement at the clinical interface has become a necessary component of healthcare measurement and improvement plans, but the effectiveness of measuring such complexity is dependent on the purpose and utility of the instrument used. Methods CEFIT was designed from a theoretical model, derived from the literature and a content validity index (CVI) procedure. A telephone population surveyed 802 eligible participants (healthcare experience within the previous 12months) to complete CEFIT. Internal consistency reliability was tested using Cronbach's . Principal component analysis was conducted to examine the factor structure and determine structural validity. Quality criteria were applied to judge aspects of utility. Results CVI found a statistically significant proportion of agreement between patient and practitioner experts for CEFIT construction. 802 eligible participants answered the CEFIT questions. Cronbach's coefficient for internal consistency indicated high reliability (0.78). Interitem (question) total correlations (0.28-0.73) were used to establish the final instrument. Principal component analysis identified one factor accounting for 57.3% variance. Quality critique rated CEFIT as fair for content validity, excellent for structural validity, good for cost, poor for acceptability and good for educational impact. Conclusions CEFIT offers a brief yet structurally sound measure of patient experience of quality of care. The briefness of the 5-item instrument arguably offers high utility in practice. Further studies are needed to explore the utility of CEFIT to provide a robust basis for feedback to local clinical teams and drive quality improvement in the provision of care experience for patients. Further development of aspects of utility is also required.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, OUR HLTH OUR CAR OUR
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, EQ EXC LIB NHS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, TARGETS TARGETS CAN
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2002, INNOVATIVE CARE CHRO
  • [5] Instruments to measure patient experience of healthcare quality in hospitals: A systematic review
    Beattie M.
    Murphy D.J.
    Atherton I.
    Lauder W.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 4 (1)
  • [6] Do the Institute of Medicine's (IOM's) dimensions of quality capture the current meaning of quality in health care? - An integrative review
    Beattie, Michelle
    Shepherd, Ashley
    Howieson, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2013, 18 (04) : 288 - 304
  • [7] Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement
    Benneyan, JC
    Lloyd, RC
    Plsek, PE
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 12 (06): : 458 - 464
  • [8] Relationship between patient reported experience (PREMs) and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) in elective surgery
    Black, Nick
    Varaganum, Mira
    Hutchings, Andrew
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2014, 23 (07) : 534 - 542
  • [9] Coaley K., 2014, INTRO PSYCHOL ASSESS
  • [10] Department of Health, 2008, HIGH QUAL CAR ALL, P10106