Estimating the ability of plants to plastically track temperature-mediated shifts in the spring phenological optimum

被引:40
作者
Tansey, Christine J. [1 ,2 ]
Hadfield, Jarrod D. [1 ]
Phillimore, Albert B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Evolutionary Biol, Kings Bldg, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Woodland Trust, Kempton Way, Grantham, England
关键词
chilling; citizen science; forcing; local adaptation; phenology; photoperiod; plasticity; space for time; CLIMATE-CHANGE; EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; LOCAL ADAPTATION; BUD BURST; TREES; RESPONSES; POPULATIONS; SENSITIVITY; PHOTOPERIOD;
D O I
10.1111/gcb.13624
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
One consequence of rising spring temperatures is that the optimum timing of key life-history events may advance. Where this is the case, a population's fate may depend on the degree to which it is able to track a change in the optimum timing either via plasticity or via adaptation. Estimating the effect that temperature change will have on optimum timing using standard approaches is logistically challenging, with the result that very few estimates of this important parameter exist. Here we adopt an alternative statistical method that substitutes space for time to estimate the temperature sensitivity of the optimum timing of 22 plant species based on >200 000 spatiotemporal phenological observations from across the United Kingdom. We find that first leafing and flowering dates are sensitive to forcing (spring) temperatures, with optimum timing advancing by an average of 3 days degrees C-1 and plastic responses to forcing between -3 and -8 days degrees C-1. Chilling (autumn/winter) temperatures and photoperiod tend to be important cues for species with early and late phenology, respectively. For most species, we find that plasticity is adaptive, and for seven species, plasticity is sufficient to track geographic variation in the optimum phenology. For four species, we find that plasticity is significantly steeper than the optimum slope that we estimate between forcing temperature and phenology, and we examine possible explanations for this countergradient pattern, including local adaptation.
引用
收藏
页码:3321 / 3334
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Potential for evolutionary responses to climate change evidence from tree populations
    Alberto, Florian J.
    Aitken, Sally N.
    Alia, Ricardo
    Gonzalez-Martinez, Santiago C.
    Hanninen, Heikki
    Kremer, Antoine
    Lefevre, Francois
    Lenormand, Thomas
    Yeaman, Sam
    Whetten, Ross
    Savolainen, Outi
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2013, 19 (06) : 1645 - 1661
  • [2] A 250-year index of first flowering dates and its response to temperature changes
    Amano, Tatsuya
    Smithers, Richard J.
    Sparks, Tim H.
    Sutherland, William J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 277 (1693) : 2451 - 2457
  • [3] [Anonymous], SOCIOL METHOD RES
  • [4] [Anonymous], MULTIVARIATE NORMAL
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2009, ASREML USER GUIDE RE
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, European forest tree species
  • [7] climwin: An R Toolbox for Climate Window Analysis
    Bailey, Liam D.
    van de Pol, Martijn
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12):
  • [8] Photoperiod sensitivity of bud burst in 14 temperate forest tree species
    Basler, David
    Koerner, Christian
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2012, 165 : 73 - 81
  • [9] Butler DG, 2017, ASReml-R Reference Manual Version 4
  • [10] Modelling the timing of Betula pubescens budburst. II. Integrating complex effects of photoperiod into process-based models
    Caffarra, Amelia
    Donnelly, Alison
    Chuine, Isabelle
    [J]. CLIMATE RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (02) : 159 - 170