A Monte Carlo model for organ dose reconstruction of patients in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy for epidemiologic studies of late effects

被引:12
|
作者
Yeom, Yeon Soo [1 ]
Kuzmin, Gleb [2 ]
Griffin, Keith [1 ]
Mille, Matthew [1 ]
Polf, Jerimy [3 ]
Langner, Ulrich [4 ]
Jung, Jae Won [5 ]
Lee, Choonik [6 ]
Ellis, Dillon [5 ]
Shin, Jungwook [7 ]
Lee, Choonsik [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, NIH, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[4] Boston Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] East Carolina Univ, Dept Phys, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Div Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
proton; pencil beam scanning; Monte Carlo; dose reconstruction; RADIOTHERAPY; SIMULATION; EXPOSURES; DOSIMETRY; CANCER; RISK;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6498/ab437d
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Significant efforts such as the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR) involving multiple proton therapy centers have been made to conduct collaborative studies evaluating outcomes following proton therapy. As a groundwork dosimetry effort for the late effect investigation, we developed a Monte Carlo (MC) model of proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) to estimate organ/tissue doses of pediatric patients at the Maryland Proton Treatment Center (MPTC), one of the proton centers involved in the PPCR. The MC beam modeling was performed using the TOPAS (TOol for PArticle Simulation) MC code and commissioned to match measurement data within 1% for range, and 0.3 mm for spot sizes. The established MC model was then tested by calculating organ/tissue doses for sample intracranial and craniospinal irradiations on whole-body pediatric computational human phantoms. The simulated dose distributions were compared with the treatment planning system dose distributions, showing the 3 mm/3% gamma index passing rates of 94%-99%, validating our simulations with the MC model. The calculated organ/tissue doses per prescribed doses for the craniospinal irradiations (1 mGy Gy(-1) to 1 Gy Gy(-1)) were generally much higher than those for the intracranial irradiations (2.1 mu Gy Gy(-1) to 0.1 Gy Gy(-1)), which is due to the larger field coverage of the craniospinal irradiations. The largest difference was observed at the adrenal dose, i.e. similar to 3000 times. In addition, the calculated organ/tissue doses were compared with those calculated with a simplified MC model, showing that the beam properties (i.e. spot size, spot divergence, mean energy, and energy spread) do not significantly influence dose calculations despite the limited irradiation cases. This implies that the use of the MC model commissioned to the MPTC measurement data might be dosimetrically acceptable for patient dose reconstructions at other proton centers particularly when their measurement data are unavailable. The developed MC model will be used to reconstruct organ/tissue doses for MPTC pediatric patients collected in the PPCR.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 242
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Commissioning of a clinical pencil beam scanning proton therapy unit for ultra-high dose rates (FLASH)
    Nesteruk, Konrad P.
    Togno, Michele
    Grossmann, Martin
    Lomax, Anthony J.
    Weber, Damien C.
    Schippers, Jacobus M.
    Safai, Sairos
    Meer, David
    Psoroulas, Serena
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (07) : 4017 - 4026
  • [42] Monte Carlo simulation of secondary neutron dose for scanning proton therapy using FLUKA
    Lee, Chaeyeong
    Lee, Sangmin
    Lee, Seung-Jae
    Song, Hankyeol
    Kim, Dae-Hyun
    Cho, Sungkoo
    Jo, Kwanghyun
    Han, Youngyih
    Chung, Yong Hyun
    Kim, Jin Sung
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (10):
  • [43] 4DMRI-based investigation on the interplay effect for pencil beam scanning proton therapy of pancreatic cancer patients
    Dolde, Kai
    Zhang, Ye
    Chaudhri, Naved
    David, Christian
    Kachelriess, Marc
    Lomax, Antony John
    Naumann, Patrick
    Saito, Nami
    Weber, Damien Charles
    Pfaffenberger, Asja
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [44] Voxel-wise dose rate calculation in clinical pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Daartz, Juliane
    Madden, Thomas M.
    Lalonde, Arthur
    Cascio, Ethan
    Verburg, Joost
    Shih, Helen
    MacDonald, Shannon
    Hachadorian, Rachael
    Schuemann, Jan
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (06)
  • [45] Simulation and experimental benchmarking of a proton pencil beam scanning nozzle model for development of MR-integrated proton therapy
    Oborn, Bradley M.
    Semioshkina, Ekaterina
    van der Kraaij, Erik
    Hoffmann, Aswin L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (09) : 6196 - 6205
  • [46] Clinical Outcome of Sacral Chordoma Patients Treated with Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Walser, M.
    Bojaxhiu, B.
    Kawashiro, S.
    Tran, S.
    Beer, J.
    Leiser, D.
    Pica, A.
    Bachtiary, B.
    Weber, D. C.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 33 (12) : E578 - E585
  • [47] Comparison of pencil-beam and Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions for proton therapy of skull-base and para-spinal tumors
    Paganetti, H.
    Parodi, K.
    Jiang, H.
    Adams, J. A.
    Kooy, H. M.
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2006, VOL 14, PTS 1-6, 2007, 14 : 2219 - +
  • [48] GATE as a GEANT4-based Monte Carlo platform for the evaluation of proton pencil beam scanning treatment plans
    Grevillot, L.
    Bertrand, D.
    Dessy, F.
    Freud, N.
    Sarrut, D.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (13) : 4223 - 4244
  • [49] Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans
    Rana, Suresh
    Greco, Kevin
    Samuel, E. James Jebaseelan
    Bennouna, Jaafar
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (08): : 36 - 46
  • [50] A novel pencil beam model for carbon-ion dose calculation derived from Monte Carlo simulations
    Zhang, Hui
    Dai, Zhongying
    Liu, Xinguo
    Chen, Weiqiang
    Ma, Yuanyuan
    He, Pengbo
    Dai, Tianyuan
    Shen, Guosheng
    Yuan, Ping
    Li, Qiang
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 55 : 15 - 24