A Monte Carlo model for organ dose reconstruction of patients in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy for epidemiologic studies of late effects

被引:12
|
作者
Yeom, Yeon Soo [1 ]
Kuzmin, Gleb [2 ]
Griffin, Keith [1 ]
Mille, Matthew [1 ]
Polf, Jerimy [3 ]
Langner, Ulrich [4 ]
Jung, Jae Won [5 ]
Lee, Choonik [6 ]
Ellis, Dillon [5 ]
Shin, Jungwook [7 ]
Lee, Choonsik [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, NIH, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[4] Boston Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] East Carolina Univ, Dept Phys, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Div Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
proton; pencil beam scanning; Monte Carlo; dose reconstruction; RADIOTHERAPY; SIMULATION; EXPOSURES; DOSIMETRY; CANCER; RISK;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6498/ab437d
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Significant efforts such as the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR) involving multiple proton therapy centers have been made to conduct collaborative studies evaluating outcomes following proton therapy. As a groundwork dosimetry effort for the late effect investigation, we developed a Monte Carlo (MC) model of proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) to estimate organ/tissue doses of pediatric patients at the Maryland Proton Treatment Center (MPTC), one of the proton centers involved in the PPCR. The MC beam modeling was performed using the TOPAS (TOol for PArticle Simulation) MC code and commissioned to match measurement data within 1% for range, and 0.3 mm for spot sizes. The established MC model was then tested by calculating organ/tissue doses for sample intracranial and craniospinal irradiations on whole-body pediatric computational human phantoms. The simulated dose distributions were compared with the treatment planning system dose distributions, showing the 3 mm/3% gamma index passing rates of 94%-99%, validating our simulations with the MC model. The calculated organ/tissue doses per prescribed doses for the craniospinal irradiations (1 mGy Gy(-1) to 1 Gy Gy(-1)) were generally much higher than those for the intracranial irradiations (2.1 mu Gy Gy(-1) to 0.1 Gy Gy(-1)), which is due to the larger field coverage of the craniospinal irradiations. The largest difference was observed at the adrenal dose, i.e. similar to 3000 times. In addition, the calculated organ/tissue doses were compared with those calculated with a simplified MC model, showing that the beam properties (i.e. spot size, spot divergence, mean energy, and energy spread) do not significantly influence dose calculations despite the limited irradiation cases. This implies that the use of the MC model commissioned to the MPTC measurement data might be dosimetrically acceptable for patient dose reconstructions at other proton centers particularly when their measurement data are unavailable. The developed MC model will be used to reconstruct organ/tissue doses for MPTC pediatric patients collected in the PPCR.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 242
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Monte Carlo pencil beam scanning model for proton treatment plan simulation using GATE/GEANT4
    Grevillot, L.
    Bertrand, D.
    Dessy, F.
    Freud, N.
    Sarrut, D.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (16) : 5203 - 5219
  • [32] A reconstruction approach for proton computed tomography by modeling the integral depth dose of the scanning proton pencil beam
    Chen, Xinyuan
    Medrano, Maria
    Sun, Baozhou
    Hao, Yao
    Reynoso, Francisco J.
    Darafsheh, Arash
    Yang, Deshan
    Zhang, Tiezhi
    Zhao, Tianyu
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (04) : 2602 - 2620
  • [33] Spatially fractionated (GRID) radiation therapy using proton pencil beam scanning (PBS): Feasibility study and clinical implementation
    Gao, M.
    Mohiuddin, M. M.
    Hartsell, W. F.
    Pankuch, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (04) : 1645 - 1653
  • [34] Effects of physics change in Monte Carlo code on electron pencil beam dose distributions
    Toutaoui, Abdelkader
    Khelassi-Toutaoui, Nadia
    Brahimi, Zakia
    Chami, Ahmed Chafik
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2012, 81 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [35] Experimental validation of a 4D dose calculation routine for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Pfeiler, Tina
    Baeumer, Christian
    Engwall, Erik
    Geismar, Dirk
    Spaan, Bernhard
    Timmermann, Beate
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2018, 28 (02): : 121 - 133
  • [36] Fast MCsquare-Based Independent Dose Verification Platform for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Liu, Chunbo
    Ho, Meng Wei
    Park, Jiyeon
    Hsi, Wen Chien
    Liang, Xiaoying
    Li, Zuofeng
    Song, Yuntao
    Feng, Hansheng
    Zhang, Yawei
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2021, 20
  • [37] Dose exposure to an adult present in the treatment room during pediatric pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Tjelta, Johannes
    Ytre-Hauge, Kristian
    Lyngholm, Erlend
    Handeland, Andreas
    Henjum, Helge
    Stokkevag, Camilla
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2023, 62 (11) : 1531 - 1535
  • [38] Producing a Beam Model of the Varian ProBeam Proton Therapy System using TOPAS Monte Carlo Toolkit
    Rahman, Mahbubur
    Bruza, Petr
    Lin, Yuting
    Gladstone, David J.
    Pogue, Brian W.
    Zhang, Rongxiao
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (12) : 6500 - 6508
  • [39] Electron dose distributions caused by the contact-type metallic eye shield: Studies using Monte Carlo and pencil beam algorithms
    Kang, Sei-Kwon
    Yoon, Jai-Woong
    Hwang, Taejin
    Park, Soah
    Cheong, Kwang-Ho
    Han, Tae Jin
    Kim, Haeyoung
    Lee, Me-Yeon
    Kim, Kyoung Ju
    Bae, Hoonsik
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2015, 40 (03) : 240 - 243
  • [40] Dose calculation differences between Monte Carlo and pencil beam depend on the tumor locations and volumes for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy
    Zhuang, Tingliang
    Djemil, Toufik
    Qi, Peng
    Magnelli, Anthony
    Stephans, Kevin
    Videtic, Gregory
    Xia, Ping
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 14 (02): : 38 - 51